Thoughts? Off the top of my head- I'd say its a nice note (despite the graffiti).
Quote:
AU for me, with a DAMAGED designation.
The #27 is not considered "damage" by most
TPG (as far as I know). Instead, they would consider the ink an "impairment."
As " TheBurnz" rightly eludes to - it cannot be UNC (uncirculated) since it has been circulated enough to have had the # written on it. However, it has got great looking (sharp) edges, corners (well centred) and I'm sure the tint/colour is nice.
It is impossible for us to tell whether its
original (in that it hasn't been pressed) but if that is the case (i.e. its
original) then it could be AU (Almost Uncirculated) which is a lot nicer than the copious number of dull 1954
pressed notes I've seen.
So, bottom line, if you like it- keep it (& yes $25 would be the approximate BV without the impairment- but you never know- you could find a buyer who's okay with that/ preferred grafitti over wrinkles/pressed notes).