| Author |
Replies: 32 / Views: 3,434 |
|
Rest in Peace
United States
5375 Posts |
Got this for $242, good buy? I can't even see what the 'details' are much, it's supposed to have altered surfaces, but I have no idea what they are. Image: 1833half.jpg93.97 KB
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
169 Posts |
That sure is a nice looking coin. I can't tell what the altered surfaces are, unless possibly it was dipped years ago? The surface issue must drop the value down somewhat, possibly to the value of an AU 50? I just saw a PCGS 45 1833 half offered for $270, so you're probably right in the ball park with the price. Nice coin! I love the Bust Half series.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6381 Posts |
"Altered Surfaces" is the favorite, catch-all reason for rejecting a coin for grading at PCGS. It could mean anything from excessive dipping (which chemically strips off the original surface, usually impairing the luster) to "thumbing" (rubbing with the thumb so skin oils make the surface look smoother) to applying artificial mint frost made from aluminum powder. I suspect in some cases Altered Surface really means the grader just didn't like the coin and needed a reason to put it in a body bag. But, that's just me.
This coin has a uniform, dark surface which appears somewhat unnatural. If it were naturally toned the color would not be so uniform. Instead it would generally be darker at the rims and smoothly shade towards a ligher color in the centers. Probably this coin was excessively dipped years ago and the exposed metal surface then toned all over at about the same rate. The original surface and luster is mostly gone. It's still a nice coin but not as desirable as one with original surface.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
986 Posts |
cleaned and artificially retoned.
|
|
Rest in Peace
 United States
5375 Posts |
Hrm....thanks for your opinions. I've seen a lot of OBVIOUSLY altered coins though, so I guess though this has had something done to it, it's not TOO bad. I definitely understand that this isn't as desirable as an original coin, but PCGS price guide for AU 58 is around 1100...so I'm thinking even if it's worth 40-50% of that, I got a bargain. Am I right to think this?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1429 Posts |
Where did you buy the coin?
|
|
Rest in Peace
 United States
5375 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
 United States
5375 Posts |
There is a return policy though, I always make sure.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
986 Posts |
do you have the coin in hand? or is that a seller's pic? it makes a BIG difference, because a lot of the time hairlines magically appear when you turn the coin under a light.
|
|
Rest in Peace
 United States
5375 Posts |
Unfortunately I learned that recently. That is a sellers pic, I will take blown up pictures with the coin in hand.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1840 Posts |
I know nothing about this series, but the area around the nose looks suspect to me. Maybe it was whizzed?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2540 Posts |
I would pass, price seems too high for an altered coin.
|
|
Rest in Peace
 United States
5375 Posts |
How much does the price generally get cut for an altered coin?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1267 Posts |
Just crack it out of the plastic and throw the label away, now you don't have to worry about it,  The coin was probably cleaned at some point (not unusual for the series) and then poorly retoned, nothing as serious as etching or carving. Suppose you could dip it again and some might, it has potential. Seriously, though $242 seems a little high, but the details on the coin are nice. You didn't do too badly. Ben
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12437 Posts |
 As Bonedigger said, it was probably aggressively dipped at some point and then retoned but the process more than likely left a high AU coin without any luster. An AU details coin should always luster and if it doesn't, you can bet that someone worked on it too much and that will get you an altered surfaces. ANACS does not use "Altered Surfaces" as a catch-all like PCGS does- anything they happen to not like gets bodybagged that way  If it was tooled, wizzed, etc, ANACS will specifically label it as such. The Heritage Numismedia price guide lists this coin @$575-700 in AU58, $225-290 in AU50, and $145-185 in EF45. It is really not a bad looking coin and obviously much less expensive than a problem-free AU58. Quote: How much does the price generally get cut for an altered coin? IMO, it really depends on the look of the coin. If it looks scrubbed and abused, the price will be abused as well. That one has dark and uniform toning but it is not a nasty blotchy toning that screams AT and in hand, luster is probably not visible. On the other hand, it is a very well detailed and centered coin with weakness in only one star and the motto ribbon is strong.
Edited by biokemist6 06/09/2008 11:46 am
|
|
Rest in Peace
 United States
5375 Posts |
Yeah, you're right, it should have more luster. But I was glad it wasn't extremely scratched or tooled or whatever. Generally, for an altered coin that still looks decent, how many percent of the normal value is it? I went by PCGS price guide and Red Book for this and whacked 50% off the list price to account for any altering. I have 2008 Red Book and AU58 seems to be around....800-900? But this was last years and its gone up a bit more I think. Just around a guess. On PCGS price guide, it seems closer to 1100-1200, but I know that its probably a bit too high. So I'm just wondering why people are saying 240 is too high of a price : / Because I figured the coin was worth at least 400-500 if it looks okay in person and that 240 was a good deal. Am I doing something wrong? If I am, I think I'll just return it.
|
| |
Replies: 32 / Views: 3,434 |