Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
300,000 items to help build your collection! Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Specializing in Modern Numismatics Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Noticed This Error In March 2018 Of Coin World Magazine.

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 9 / Views: 2,420Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community
ckrakowski's Avatar
979 Posts
 Posted 03/19/2018  4:10 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add ckrakowski to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
In the section where they talk about key dates they talk about the Washington key date quarter.

Here is what the magazine says word for word:

In 1932, the Philadelphia Mint struck 5,404,000 coins, the Denver Mint struck 436,800 coins and the San Francisco Mint struck 408,000 coins. The 1932 Philadelphia production is not considered a key date. Even though the San Francisco Mint struck more quarter dollars than did the Denver facility, the 1932-D is the series' top key date.

This what the magazine says word for word.

Here is the error.

If the San Francisco Mint minted 408,000 and Denver minted 436,800 than why do they say that San Francisco struck more quarter dollars? Wouldn't it be Denver struck more?

Is there any way to contact Coin World magazine and let them know of this error.

If you have the magazine it is on page 33 on the right hand side.

Mods if this is not the place for this please do not hesitate to move it.
Bedrock of the Community
Coinfrog's Avatar
United States
94367 Posts
 Posted 03/19/2018  4:25 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Coinfrog to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Fewer Denver coins were saved in MS than San Francisco coins in MS, and thus the Denver coin is more expensive. The article is correct.
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
188130 Posts
 Posted 03/19/2018  4:35 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jbuck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
The article is correct.
Not completely. There is an error, which ckrakowski correctly identified.


Quote:
If the San Francisco Mint minted 408,000 and Denver minted 436,800 than why do they say that San Francisco struck more quarter dollars? Wouldn't it be Denver struck more?
Yes. Perhaps they meant to say "Even though the San Francisco Mint struck fewer quarter dollars than did the Denver facility, the 1932-D is the series' top key date."
Rest in Peace
Crazyb0's Avatar
10197 Posts
 Posted 03/19/2018  5:18 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Crazyb0 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Ambiguous, at best. As to Frogs statement, the article didn't mention MS.

I got a few nits....
Edited by Crazyb0
03/19/2018 5:19 pm
Rest in Peace
moxking's Avatar
United States
17900 Posts
 Posted 03/19/2018  6:07 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add moxking to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
There are a lot more Washington collectors that do attempt an MS set than any other quarter series.

It's easy to think in MS terms for them.

There's nothing wrong with a nice circulated set, either.

But it isn't too tough in MS.
Moderator
Learn More...
nickelsearcher's Avatar
United States
15409 Posts
 Posted 03/19/2018  6:48 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add nickelsearcher to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Concur with jbuck suggested revisions ... but IMHO its not worth pursuing a correction for one word change.
Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.art
Pillar of the Community
Debrajc's Avatar
United States
4211 Posts
 Posted 03/20/2018  09:38 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Debrajc to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I would just let it be. Those of us that collect understand
the 1932-D is the key date, even tho there were a bit less
S minted coins.
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
188130 Posts
 Posted 03/20/2018  09:56 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jbuck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
There are a lot more Washington collectors that do attempt an MS set than any other quarter series.

It's easy to think in MS terms for them.

There's nothing wrong with a nice circulated set, either.

But it isn't too tough in MS.
Mine is a curious mix of both.

Many of the more common dates are circulated because I started building the set from roll hunting. Most everything else, expect the aforementioned 32-D and 32-S, are AU-MS since I was taking time and buying coins to fill the holes.

I originally intended to update the lower grade pieces, but could never bring myself to do it. I have had those coins for a very long time (they were originally in a Whitman folder before the Dansco) and have fond memories of finding them. It may not be a matched set, but it brings me joy when I look at them and I see the contrast between what I found and what I bought.
Pillar of the Community
ckrakowski's Avatar
979 Posts
 Posted 03/20/2018  8:23 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add ckrakowski to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It is nice to see what you really believe nickel.

So you believe people should be given the wrong info.

Well I can say that I will stay far away from you and not do any business with you and will no longer believe anything you say on this site.
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
188130 Posts
 Posted 03/21/2018  09:24 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jbuck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
So you believe people should be given the wrong info.
I never said that.

I suggested that they meant to say "Even though the San Francisco Mint struck fewer quarter dollars than did the Denver facility, the 1932-D is the series' top key date."

It is implied by my statement that they used the wrong word and is in need of correction.
  Previous TopicReplies: 9 / Views: 2,420Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.38 seconds to rattle this change. Forums