| Author |
Replies: 64 / Views: 4,992 |
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
330 Posts |
That 1917D, look at the field on the lower left and there are some fine scratches in a \\\\\\ direction. If those scratches are incuse (they probably are), that's a sign of cleaning. I wouldn't call it worthless, but its grade might go down a bit. It looks like it has a full head according to PCGS guide ( https://www.PCGS.com/News/Tips-From...20Part%201). What grade did you buy it as? As for why someone would want to tamper with the thing: well, NGC price guide says that a 1917D type 1 full head is $300 if AU-58 and $1525 if MS-65. The 1929 looks pretty good -- it has a varying luster about it and it doesn't appear to have those light scratches (though the angle might be obscuring them, they're not easy to see to begin with). It also looks like it doesn't have a full head. Compare this with the 1917D and see if they reflect light differently. That might be a good reference. Less certain on the last one but as I don't see fine scratches I'd vote natural. (If anybody else wants to offer a different opinion feel free to, I'm not the ultimate expert on this, just have been paying more attention to coin surfaces lately and been asking the local dealer for opinions on whether or not the surfaces are artificial.)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3058 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
512 Posts |
Nautilator, I bought as "bu" as that was what as advertised. I paid a good bit less than 300, the au58 price. So I dont know. Ithas scratches in addition to the dead luster?
I dont have the 29. Thinking about bidding.
Coinlover yes, uou re cotrect. Almost bough that one so I was curious if it too was fatally flawed.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
512 Posts |
No more reviews? Is the 1917 completely lacking luster? Sad that such great definition is worthless.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
On the 1917, please post both sides of the coin in the same post.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
Quote: So I guess that must have been dipped too and is worthless. Dipping doesn't make a coin worthless or even a details coin when done right you can't even tell it was done. It has been an acceptable practice with coins for decades.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
Below is the ebay listing for your 1917. From the photos the coin appears cleaned. Note the hairlines on both the obverse and reverse fields that were caused by wiping the coin. I would grade the coin UNC Details cleaned. It looks like the cleaning may have removed some of the coin's luster. The value of the coin is around $150. I would recommend that you return the coin for a refund. You are better off buying a TPG graded coin. A 1917 type 1 full head MS61 sells in the same price range that you paid for the coin. 253485751709
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8715 Posts |
- The 1917 appears cleaned. Note the fine scratches all going in the same direction, that are present in the images.
- The 1929, I can't tell if it is cleaned, as the photo is not good.
- The last one appears to not be cleaned.
I would return the coin immediately. It is obviously not BU and uncleaned. What grading service graded your MS-65 Mercury dime?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
512 Posts |
OK, I will return it. Although it's a 1917-D, if that matters, I think those are a little more exensive. Here's another coin I bought, it wasn't as expensive though.  I guess a novice buying unslabbed coins is like chasing fool's gold. Or a fool chasing gold. I bought a bunch of Franklin halves for about 25% over melt value. They're nice to look at. Don't think I could have gone too wrong there.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
512 Posts |
Here's the back of the 1929.  How about nickels, do they clean those too? If a coin has toning on it, does that imply it hasn't been cleaned and is thus safe? Or can it tone after a cleaning, eventually and be kind of the worst of both worlds.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
512 Posts |
Here's a coin I was going to bid on, but if mine looks cleaned with minimal luster, than this one does too. What do you think? And thanks for your expertise. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
Quote:
OK, I will return it. Although it's a 1917-D, if that matters, I think those are a little more expensive My bad, I missed the D. If your coin graded UNC Details Cleaned, the value would be about $250. Your buy was in the price range of the coin. If the coin was graded by a TPG, sometimes they will kick a cleaned UNC coin down to AU Details Cleaned. I retract my recommendation about returning the coin. It is your call if you want a cleaned coin. The seller knew that coin was cleaned because he would have sent a none cleaned 1917 D in for grading.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
512 Posts |
Thank you for your expertise. Do you think my coin is woefully lacking in luster? I think that's true, that they would have sent a coin with such great details in for grading. They either didn't as they knew it had been cleaned or they got it back and the TPG said cleaned.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
First, do not buy any coins from GSC as you can not do an accurate grade from their photos. They sell a lot of problem coins that do not appear as a problem from their photos.
Second, there is a grading forum where you can post coins for grading opinions. When requesting a grade, you need to post both sides of the coin.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
Quote:You are better off buying a TPG graded coin. +1000
|
| |
Replies: 64 / Views: 4,992 |