| Author |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,116 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
710 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2624 Posts |
I think not. The mint marks look to be positioned differently.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
710 Posts |
Thought the Mint mark was a separate process and so varied...?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2624 Posts |
The mint mark is applied to the die. that die then produces a series of coins with the mint mark in the same location. For the chips to be different stages of the same chip/crack it would have to be on the same die with the mint mark in the same location.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
710 Posts |
Ok... I get ya!
So this was just a common place for a die crack? LOL
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1609 Posts |
Edited by RoyCoinBoy 04/09/2018 8:47 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
710 Posts |
Yes, they are close but sightly off... I can see that. But in my non expert opinion and I am just learning, sooooo  ... I still think they are related.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
Second cousins, perhaps 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1609 Posts |
I do think they are related. I feel there's next to no chance that the same mintmark on the same year in the same position on two different dies that just so happen to have two die cracks at the same angle in the same place with the same starting and ending points. I feel that's about as likely as a penny being struck by lightning while falling from the empire state building.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2624 Posts |
A wandering mint mark?  That is new to me. I saw two coins with mint marks in different locations. after closer inspection I see a small crack on the bottom of the five on the first coin that appears to be slightly longer on the second although it isn't as clear. Perhaps you are correct.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
710 Posts |
 Although I am a newbie!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
710 Posts |
Any other opinions... I have found a few other error pennies with relatives... Like for example the "9-5" in a series of 1957 D pennies (15 pennies total), where the Die Cud goes from the 9 to both 9 & 5 and then just shows in the 5 (assuming that things move towards the rim). I added a few pics to this post where someone had discovered the same... http://goccf.com/t/304934So I am trying to get more of an eye and mindset on discovering stages of an error like this... Thanks!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
DrDon is correct.  They are two different dies. The locations are fixed, they don't move. Same events happen on dies because they go through the same process sometimes a million times+. The mint mark positions don't lie. They are like finger prints on the coins they strike. If these were non mint marked, it would sound reasonable, but not able to be proved. But with a mint mark, the location is the fingerprint back to the die.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
710 Posts |
OK good to know... The crack is just so dead on looking...  Same thing twice... Made me think I was seeing a progression.
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,116 |
|