| Author |
 Replies: 19 / Views: 4,954 |
|
New Member
United States
20 Posts |
*** Edited by Staff to Add Year / Mintmark / Denomination to Title. Titles are Important! ***Does anyone know if the denver mint produced a 1992 d small date? Thanks
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
14463 Posts |
|
|
New Member
 United States
20 Posts |
What would you recommend a person do if he or she found one?
|
|
Valued Member
United States
274 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
7234 Posts |
Quote:
What would you recommend a person do if he or she found one? After you crapped your pants then sell it!! You do mean a 1992 Close AM? Right? Edited by Mark1959
04/28/2018 11:16 pm
|
|
New Member
United States
20 Posts |
No, its a 1992 D small date. All the 1992 d pennies Ive seen are all regular date.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2624 Posts |
  Please post photos of your coin. Obverse and reverse pluss close up of date. |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12477 Posts |
Since it has only been hinted at, we are talking about a Lincoln Memorial cent, correct? Pics are absolutely necessary to determine anything.  In Memory of Crazyb0 12-26-1951 to 7-27-2020
In Memory of Tootallious 3-31-1964 to 4-15-2020
In Memory of T-BOP 10-12-1949 to 1-19-2024
|
|
New Member
United States
20 Posts |
Ive been trying to take a picture but my cellphone camera is not the best. They all come out blurry. Please be patient and I will see if I can post a picture using a different device.
|
|
New Member
United States
20 Posts |
Yes its a Lincoln memorial. 1992 D small date.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
939 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
10197 Posts |
There may be the effect of a smaller "slender" appearance than a normal width device. This isn't a design change just a machine process, maybe an over-polished die has decreased the depth of the devices, that causes thinner looking letters/numbers. Also, it could be a newer made coin, first runs were crisper and cleaner, not so flattened by use and circulation. But no, there was no specific design of two different sizes used that year. The process of hydraulically stamping was being replaced with a single-squeeze minting technique at the time as well, may be a factor your eyes register.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
None are listed. The only obverse is one for all three mints. As mentioned, some devices can be reduced by die polishing, removing the fields, making the devices smaller. But when the die was created, it was normal. But no such thing was created on the die. Images would help us determine if the die polishing happened or not. Usually when die polishing happens on the date are, it is usually the 1 that shows die alteration.  Note the only device affected is the first ono. On a true small date, all the devices are affected, even the bust:  Note how all the devices and bust is affected. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
939 Posts |
I predict seeing a 1968 Small date post in the future.... :D
|
|
Moderator
United States
56855 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 19 / Views: 4,954 |
Posted 04/28/2018 10:19 pm
