| Author |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,595 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
475 Posts |
  This one looks pretty good!
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
475 Posts |
I'm thinking high AU or possibly MS. STrike seems decent but not strong.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11904 Posts |
i don't see any wear. ms62 due to hits in the focal point on both sides. looks like a typical strike for the harder copper nickel composite.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
MS-63 , Slight weak strike . 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
62, lack of strong eye appeal holds it back.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8715 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
Technical Grade 63. Eye Appeal 4/10.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
475 Posts |
I'm ok on eye appeal. The copper nickel IHCs typically dont have a lot unless you get into RB or RD MS examples. I decided to pick it up.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2125 Posts |
AU-55. Nice diamond detail!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36880 Posts |
I do see wear on the high points when you blow the photo up. Especially the wreath and bow on reverse and feather edges and ribbon. AU-55
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
475 Posts |
It's a raw coin. Listing said "AU++". I paid $120. I think it is a good deal and nice addition
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18708 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
709 Posts |
AU55 is as high as I can go on this one.
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,595 |
|