Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer 300,000 items to help build your collection! Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Specializing in Modern Numismatics








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Any Idea Why Mints Skipped Years In Gold Coin Production?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 1,415Next Topic  
New Member
MaxVCad's Avatar
United States
20 Posts
 Posted 05/25/2018  2:47 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add MaxVCad to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Hey guys.. I'm building my collection and my theme is 1928-S when possible, 1928-P for when the coin wasn't produced in San Francisco that year. I'd like to add a $10 and a $5 gold coin to my collection as they were in circulation during this era but weren't specifically minted in 1928. The last year the $10 was minted prior to 1928 was in 1926 and the $5 in 1916.

Do you guys know why the mint skipped years with these coins? Was it just because there wasn't a need? There were enough $5 coins in circulation they stopped producing them in 1916, for example? If that's the case, if someone went to a bank in 1928 to trade a $5 or a $10 bill for gold, would this bank give them a 1926 $10, for example? Or would they have to give the person 4 $2.50s because those were actually in production and could be ordered from the mint.

I think you can kind of see where I'm going with this.. I'm trying to justify adding a 1916 $5 and a 1926 $10 to my collection with the idea that those would've been the coins in use in 1928 when one went to a bank.

Any thoughts/theories/facts are appreciated.
Edited by MaxVCad
05/25/2018 2:49 pm
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
187702 Posts
 Posted 05/25/2018  4:19 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jbuck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Mintage is driven by demand. If there are enough coins in circulation to meet demand then they are not minted. Gold did not circulate like silver did, so there will be larger gaps in its mintage.
Rest in Peace
Crazyb0's Avatar
10197 Posts
 Posted 05/25/2018  4:31 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Crazyb0 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
They would be given what the bank had on hand that day, if any. The Gold redeemable dollars say "In Gold" not which way. Same as today, you want a metal dollar, you get what's in the teller's tray, that is all the bank is "obligated" to give. They may have even refused to honor the request if your bill wasn't a Gold bill, siler certs got you a silver. Then take in the mass melts of both, why some are near impossible to find.
Rest in Peace
moxking's Avatar
United States
17900 Posts
 Posted 05/25/2018  7:01 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add moxking to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I collect by date, choosing years that have a wide range of types included.

I ALWAYS spend an inordinate amount of time deciding on a date, based on availability in price ranges I like.

For example, 1883 with four Morgan's, 3 type nickels, and reasonably priced gold.

Or 1853 which is a decades long challenge with so many types.

I also ran in to problems with the 3 Indian gold and Saint. Either they missed dates or they were prohibitively expensive.

I cheated by doing 1934 and just buying nice types of the Indians and Saint.
Bedrock of the Community
Coinfrog's Avatar
United States
94367 Posts
 Posted 05/25/2018  7:13 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Coinfrog to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Complicated subject. I think @jbuck is correct, gold production by the 20th century was essentially demand-related. But what a teller might give someone in exchange for a bill, gold-denominated or not, would simply be a matter of bank policy and what happened to be in the teller's change drawer. It would have NOTHING to do with the dates on the coins.

It is important to remember that most people accepted most federal paper money then (as now) at face value, regardless of whether it happened to be backed by a precious metal. People were not typically running around converting notes to bullion to stuff away. The convertibility of some notes (gold and silver certificates) and non-convertibility of other notes (US Notes and Federal Reserve issues) was a legislative matter that had little effect on day-to-day commerce.
  Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 1,415Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.28 seconds to rattle this change. Forums