| Author |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,704 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1461 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3733 Posts |
A lot of chatter but I am a ms 65..can't say for cameo on these photos..
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
291 Posts |
I'll guess NGC MS-65, ICCS MS-64 on both.
Edited by KHatt 06/18/2018 9:54 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
The number of small nicks and scratches is perfectly consistent with MS63, for both.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
74770 Posts |
Ms-64 for both. Although, I'm far from being an expert in grading.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1530 Posts |
I'll say MS64-Cam on the quarter, and MS63 on the Dollar because of the rub on the hair directly over the ear.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1192 Posts |
NGC 64, ICCS 64 on the quarter NGC 65, ICCS 64 on the dollar.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
1461 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2187 Posts |
I would've said 64 for both. I'm surprised it came back a 63
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
743 Posts |
So in terms of value and so on would it be worth even sending MS63/64 coins in for grading for 60s era silver?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
1461 Posts |
Quote: So in terms of value and so on would it be worth even sending MS63/64 coins in for grading for 60s era silver? Short answer is "no". For Dollar pieces MS63 is a loss MS64 is a break even. Irrelevant of holder. Saying that, since not many of these coins are holdered, there is a market for some collectors doing grade runs.
Edited by TheCoinHunter 06/20/2018 4:34 pm
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,704 |
|