Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Specializing in Modern Numismatics Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall 300,000 items to help build your collection! Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin Auctions








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1988 D LMC Thickest Mintmark I Have Ever Seen. Possible MMS-011?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 8 / Views: 1,462Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community
Jim0815's Avatar
United States
5240 Posts
 Posted 07/10/2018  9:21 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Jim0815 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I found this 1988 D LMC with the thickest mintmark I have ever seen. It is almost three times thicker than the numbers. Why would this devise be so much thicker than the devises above it?
1988-D-LMC-Thickest-Mintmark-I-Have-Ever-Seen.-Possible-MMS-011?
1988-D-LMC-Thickest-Mintmark-I-Have-Ever-Seen.-Possible-MMS-011?
1988-D-LMC-Thickest-Mintmark-I-Have-Ever-Seen.-Possible-MMS-011?
1988-D-LMC-Thickest-Mintmark-I-Have-Ever-Seen.-Possible-MMS-011?
Edited by Jim0815
07/11/2018 07:55 am
Bedrock of the Community
Errers and Varietys's Avatar
United States
75233 Posts
 Posted 07/10/2018  9:27 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Errers and Varietys to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Wow Jim! That's a pretty thick mint mark! I'm not sure what caused it, but it's very unusual for sure.
Errers and Varietys.
Pillar of the Community
Jim0815's Avatar
United States
5240 Posts
 Posted 07/10/2018  9:34 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Jim0815 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It is for sure! I see no signs of grease or abrasion on any of the other devises to make them thinner. Everything is of normal size and depth.
Bedrock of the Community
Errers and Varietys's Avatar
United States
75233 Posts
 Posted 07/10/2018  9:51 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Errers and Varietys to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Jim, maybe they made the mint mark punch a little too thick?
Errers and Varietys.
Pillar of the Community
Jim0815's Avatar
United States
5240 Posts
 Posted 07/10/2018  9:57 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Jim0815 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
A very distinct possibility!
Pillar of the Community
Waynoah83's Avatar
586 Posts
 Posted 07/10/2018  10:56 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Waynoah83 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Maybe they had to do some polishing there and thought the mm was getting a little skinny so they repunched it and it went a little deeper than normal. That would possibly explain why there's such a discrepancy in size and height too. This coin might be a late die state and having the mm repunched on the die, on top of the old one, you end up with something like this. We all know those 88's are notorious for polishing and the D's are usually pretty skinny. That's just my theory. Don't know if any of the above mentioned is even feasible. Just throwing this out there, do any mints produce for other mints? Did Philly make some for Denver and have a Diff mint mark? It doesn't look like it's in the usual spot.
Bedrock of the Community
coop's Avatar
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 07/10/2018  10:59 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Keep in mind the mint mark is added to the die by hand till 1990. So if the punch set it that deep, it would be normal for that year. Not a RPM. Just a deeper set mint mark into the die. Now taller on the coin than the date devices.
Pillar of the Community
Jim0815's Avatar
United States
5240 Posts
 Posted 07/11/2018  05:22 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Jim0815 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks Waynoah and Mr. Coop. After doing a little research error-ref calls this a deeply punched mintmark. They are not for sure what exactly causes it but it's unusual in the fact that the interior of the D is just slightly below the devise yet higher than the surrounding fields. Error-ref actually have this as a variety.
Edited by Jim0815
07/11/2018 05:50 am
Pillar of the Community
Jim0815's Avatar
United States
5240 Posts
 Posted 07/11/2018  07:07 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Jim0815 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
@coop, the info I found on V.V. shows that the mintmark used for 1988 D was the MMS-012, 1987 D's used the MMS-011 with a few using the MMS-012. On the error-reference site they explained the deep punched mint mark referencing the 1987 D as the year with the deep punched mint mark and had a couple of pics of of them. The more I look at this cent the more I am convinced the mintmark on my 1988 D is a MMS-011.
Edited by Jim0815
07/11/2018 07:39 am
  Previous TopicReplies: 8 / Views: 1,462Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.29 seconds to rattle this change. Forums