| Author |
Replies: 61 / Views: 7,025 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3479 Posts |
No, no, no Baseball. It's not like that. I just didn't want you to think that I believed a coin could evaporate. Any who. So do you guys consider my 1862 Seated dollar to have terminal toning? Because in the Seated dollar world, advanced collectors pay premiums for coins with this look especially on rare issues.  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3479 Posts |
Or how about my 1870. Terminal toning or no?  
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
Quote: .. I just didn't want you to think that I believed a coin could evaporate. My responses aren't always necessarily geared towards other posters. I know people that are very new read threads and may not get sarcasm or have the understanding to know what's going on. I do try and keep that in mind with some responses to blank threads like that which is why I will respond how I do with a little extra. As far as the dollar technically yes it's ternimal from that picture. Is that necessarily a bad thing no it's not. As I mentioned seated and Morgan toning is very different and what the market likes is very different. It's hard to say from a pic, but if ithe toning is thick it's pretty nutrual at best. A lot of the heavy hitters don't like heavy dark toning.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3479 Posts |
Quote:That's my vote. What's the half-life of a Seated dollar?  I don't know but I guess the TPG's need to start putting expiration dates on these friggin things according to some. If not, for this, the TPG's too will soon pay a terrible price. 
Edited by MikeF 07/18/2018 03:17 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5673 Posts |
It's interesting, I don't collect SL dollars, but I really like the dark look of those two dollars, while I think that kind of toning would look ugly on a Morgan. Maybe it's just that there are so many white BU Morgans that it's hard to imagine them in a high grade with terminal toning.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
12477 Posts |
Quote:
That's interesting considering my response specifically talked about corrosion and never once mentioned evaporation at all.
It helps to actually read content and not just decide to try and take shots at someone. Your response did not include the word "corrosion" and it followed a direct quote about "evaporation". So, if you like to steer your comments to new collectors, it may have been appropriate to clarify within your statement what, exactly, you were speaking of. Please clarify your position better in the future. However, I don't buy it. 
In Memory of Crazyb0 12-26-1951 to 7-27-2020 In Memory of Tootallious 3-31-1964 to 4-15-2020 In Memory of T-BOP 10-12-1949 to 1-19-2024
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
Quote: Your response did not include the word "corrosion" and it followed a direct quote about "evaporation". So, if you like to steer your comments to new collectors, it may have been appropriate to clarify within your statement what, exactly, you were speaking of. Please clarify your position better in the future.
It really helps to actually read things since I did specifically say corrosion in my post. It seems that your posts for a while now are just you trying to play gotcha games with me. I'm going to be ignoring your trolling from now on if you don't have anything of substance to add since I haven't seen any yet.
Edited by basebal21 07/18/2018 04:50 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
21618 Posts |
To get this thread back on track and if you don't mind me sneaking in a Canadian 1966 Silver Dollar. It is only black on side.The reverse is a golden colour. I have others but this is the only one I have a photo of. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1888 Posts |
Quote: advanced collectors pay premiums for coins with this look especially on rare issues. I certainly did not know that when I bought my 1869. Toning is a chemical reaction between the raw silver surface of a coin and pollutants in the atmosphere. When there is no more silver surface available to be attacked, the coin will turn black. Thus all three Seated dollars previously posted appear to be 'terminal'. edit: Perhaps the term 'terminal' should be discarded in favor of 'end stage' as the former somehow implies that the coin has 'died', which, if MikeF's quote is reliable, is certainly the opposite of coin death.
Edited by mysilveryears 07/18/2018 10:57 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
5464 Posts |
Quote: You'll never pin it down. Exactly. I couldn't imagine spending a lifetime or career in the numismatic world debating or defining this subject but there are those who have.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1267 Posts |
Terminal, or end stage toning is when the toning process has progressed to the point that the toning no longer forms a protective layer on a coins surfaces and starts to actually eat into the surfaces.....environmental damage. The color is not limited to black, it can be brown. The tell is whether there's luster still present or not. If the coin exibits luster under the toning, it is not terminal.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3479 Posts |
Yeah it sounds like there is no clear and concise answer and still sounds like total BS. Advanced collectors demand coins with original surfaces. Yet coins 200 years old with original surfaces will have darker crusty toning. So which is it?
I don't think anyone has taken any time to think about it or write about it. Perhaps it's an old dinosaur term used often in the 60s and 70s when cleaned and blast white coins were in. Sounds like an obsolete term that really shouldn't be used in today's numismatic circles.
Edited by MikeF 07/19/2018 02:11 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
Quote: . Advanced collectors demand coins with original surfaces. They do, but it's original as in hasn't been cleaned/messed with or isn't still clearly recovering from an old cleaning. Really you can just simplify it to eye appeal is king and original isn't always a plus for that. Quote: . Yet coins 200 years old with original surfaces will have darker crusty toning. Not exactly. Some people have the belief that if it's old it had to have gotten a lot of dark toning yet hoards constistantly disprove that theory. Forwhater reason coins all tone and take on toning differently. Some tone quick others seem to never tone no matter what you do without applying chemicals or heating it severely. You can also find plenty of collectors with coins they've had for decades that haven't changed. While some of them certainly would have taken on dark crusty toning it's far from a given they would have to have the heavy dark look that many don't like. Quote: . Perhaps it's an old dinosaur term used often in the 60s and 70s when cleaned and blast white coins were in. Blast white is still a very popular look that many collectors including advanced ones like. Blast white vs toned preference isn't a debate that's likely to end anytime in any of our lives as it's really just a matter of personal taste. Color is clearly king in terms of premiums which is why those stopped getting dipped out but there really isn't a right or wrong answer to toned vs blast white overall lower grades excluded. To me terminal is pretty good and accurate descriptor of the blackish toning. It's just describing the end of the toning cycle and fits well when you think about it just in regards to the color. And not the coin itself. It's really just saying the bright colorful toning is dead and not coming back as it reached the end of its cycle
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7840 Posts |
There was this one Seated dollar that the seller and I just could not see "eye to eye" on as far as price goes, and it was described by the seller as Gun Metal Blue. It looked black to me in the images, but one can only tell so much from an image, and I am color blind to boot. It sure was a nice looking coin. I just checked and he still has it in his inventory too. I was just thinking about what was holding me back...it's in another holder than PCGS and I am not sure it would cross over to PCGS. Terminal toning (to me) is when a coin is no longer attractive.
Edited by oih82w8 07/19/2018 10:19 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8715 Posts |
Quote: To me terminal is pretty good and accurate descriptor of the blackish toning. It's just describing the end of the toning cycle and fits well when you think about it just in regards to the color. And not the coin itself. It's really just saying the bright colorful toning is dead and not coming back as it reached the end of its cycle 
|
| |
Replies: 61 / Views: 7,025 |