Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsVancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall 300,000 items to help build your collection! Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1972-P Lincoln Cent Thin Planchet

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 9 / Views: 2,172Next Topic  
Valued Member

United States
60 Posts
 Posted 07/31/2018  08:05 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Achilles to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Hi All, I found this recently in some change and was wondering if anybody would be able to shed some light on it. I believe it is a thin planchet error. A 'Split Planchet' would be choppy on one side - is this correct? I cannot find any other instances of a 1972-P online. It weighs 2.41 grams!
1972-P-Lincoln-Cent-Thin-Planchet
1972-P-Lincoln-Cent-Thin-Planchet
1972-P-Lincoln-Cent-Thin-Planchet
Moderator
Learn More...
John1's Avatar
United States
56855 Posts
 Posted 07/31/2018  08:29 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add John1 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Looks like a Struck Through Grease,but it should weigh 3.1 grams +/-.13
John1
Valued Member
mamastinky's Avatar
United States
441 Posts
 Posted 07/31/2018  08:35 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add mamastinky to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Looks like a Struck Through Grease,but it should weigh 3.1 grams +/-.13

It does look like that. However, if the planchet lacked that much mass, would you expect that somewhere in the strike, the metal cannot fill? I am not intimate with this type of error.
Valued Member
United States
60 Posts
 Posted 07/31/2018  08:48 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Achilles to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
From what I've seen, other instances of thin planchet cents have that hourglass deletion on the reverse. I think it's because there just isn't enough metal to get a full strike and the reverse area suffers most for it. It really is super thin, you can easily feel it when you pick it up. The weight is off even for a zincoln. What I'm trying to gauge is the rarity of the error for the date/mint and if 'Thin Planchet' would be the correct error name. Thanks for any information anyone out there may have.
Moderator
Learn More...
John1's Avatar
United States
56855 Posts
 Posted 07/31/2018  09:54 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add John1 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Give it a bit and a few pros might chime in.
John1
Bedrock of the Community
coop's Avatar
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 07/31/2018  10:07 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'm thinking it is a thinned planchet issue.
Pillar of the Community
Halo1st's Avatar
United States
2775 Posts
 Posted 07/31/2018  10:20 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Halo1st to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'm thinking rolled thin planchet or stock. The weakness opposite the bust on the reverse is usually present, because of the material shortage, but also the bust seems to take up the resources before the backside can backfill fully even on planchets of normal weight .

I don't see any roughness associated with a split planchet before strike. Though I've seen some websites list these as such.

Another possibility is struck on a foreign planchet or rolled stock. I would need to research more to rule that out. Thanks, Doug.

Adding: I see Denver and San Francisco were busy producing foreign coinage this year with a similar composition, but nothing listed for the Philly mint.
Edited by Halo1st
07/31/2018 10:51 am
Valued Member
United States
60 Posts
 Posted 07/31/2018  11:24 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Achilles to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Really appreciate the feedback and the leads.

I'm not familiar with methods of determining if a coin is minted on a foreign planchet but I did test it with a magnet - it's not magnetic and appears to be copper anyway. Will have to look into that, its prob not the case from what you're saying but now you have me curious.
New Member
gfymf667's Avatar
United States
25 Posts
 Posted 07/31/2018  12:24 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add gfymf667 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Check it for conductivity or check around for pkanchet specs.it could be aluminum. If so a probable 1974 transition program canceled
Bedrock of the Community
Errers and Varietys's Avatar
United States
74846 Posts
 Posted 07/31/2018  1:02 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Errers and Varietys to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It's definitely a thin planchet issue. It only weights 2.41 grams. It's a underweight planchet.
Errers and Varietys.
  Previous TopicReplies: 9 / Views: 2,172Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.31 seconds to rattle this change. Forums