| Author |
 Replies: 12 / Views: 1,293 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1448 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18635 Posts |
for me this is a challenging one. the surfaces exhibit a slight amount of wear or it could be from a weak strike. it could either be AU58 or MS63. I'm leaning towards MS63 as I'm not seeing any signs of wear on the reverse (talons, wings or neck)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5825 Posts |
Nice one.
I was worried about the scratches on the obverse (in front of the face) but they don't appear to continue across the devices so for now I'll say "original surfaces".
I see AU-55 or -58.
I'd call it a Browning-4, rarity R-1.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8715 Posts |
Probably market graded by PCGS to MS-63. My grade is AU-58.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
AU-58 here as well. Appears mishandled if not actually circulated.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36558 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
397 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1339 Posts |
I want to say AU58, but could easily say AU details...looks obv. wiped..what is under LIBERTY's ear?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
Yes,  and see it as an AU58. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4468 Posts |
The coin looks like it has had a recent dip. AU55
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1448 Posts |
AU55 PCGS with cac is the grade
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11880 Posts |
i was thinking ms62. nice luster
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,293 |
|
Posted 08/20/2018 11:30 am
