| Author |
 Replies: 21 / Views: 5,171 |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1461 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
683 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
AU-55, great detail, hardly any wear that I can see.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1192 Posts |
EF45 environmental damage.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1463 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
402 Posts |
EF40 (don't see alot of ICCS 45's
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
1461 Posts |
This is what we call an ICCS "Net grade"  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36745 Posts |
40 seems a little conservative.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
605 Posts |
Would that die break on "N" Canada add anything to the value?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Seriously undergraded. ICCS continues to thrive with outdated technology well into the 21st century. Their opinion is next to worthless for serious collectors.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
851 Posts |
I'd go AU.
I don't send anything to ICCS. Waste of money imo. Easier to just write the grade on the 2x2.
|
|
Moderator
 Canada
10458 Posts |
Cut the flip - dip the coin (dilute the dip with distilled water 1:5, 20%)... then send it in with your next batch to ICCS...
"Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert OppenheimerContent of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_USMy eBay store
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
822 Posts |
It seems to me that the US collectors almost always grade higher than Canadian collectors. Just look at how ACG grades were once accepted as real, when they were always more than a whole grade lower than any other TPG. That coin is an ugly EF, just check the wear at the bottom of the bust- AU would not have that. As SPP says, dip it. |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1461 Posts |
Not to say I haven't dipped coins in the past when I felt appropriate, but I generally try to keep coins in their original toned state. For one, because it makes the coin unique and I personally like toning (even ugly toning), but I do understand my view on toning represents the minority. Dipping can also expose other issues that may have toned over time. Saying that, I believe this is a good example (and an argument against those who claim ICCS is a "technical" grader) of a coin being net graded. A practice I generally dislike. Grade the coins properly and let the market decide how the coin will get penalized base on how nice or ugly it is. As many of you are familiar, I like to experiment with grading...So...I'll take it on. I'll "conserve it"...and resend...Stay tuned....
|
|
Moderator
Canada
10458 Posts |
Dipping it in a diluted solution puts you more in control - I never dip a coin in pure coin dip... it is way too harsh. A 10% dip solution (10 parts distilled pater for 1 part coin dip) will take some of the harshness off the obverse, without making it a blast white coin...
Find some crappy melt-grade silver coins and practice with different dilution rates... even a 5% dip solution (20 parts distilled water to 1 part coin dip) can make a difference without shocking the coin...
"Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert OppenheimerContent of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_USMy eBay store
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1461 Posts |
I think this is as good as it's going to get.   |
| |
Replies: 21 / Views: 5,171 |
Posted 09/21/2018 5:40 pm
