Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Specializing in Modern Numismatics Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. 300,000 items to help build your collection!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1922 D Lincoln Wheat Cent Graded High?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 18 / Views: 2,684Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar of the Community
luvmyCAM's Avatar
United States
1479 Posts
 Posted 09/30/2018  10:31 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add luvmyCAM to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Well this rascal looks like a MS63 BRN to me PCGS graded it 64 BRN. I'm all over the place with my grading skills so opinions are welcome. Been looking and waiting for a RB example with no luck and the RD examples I saw were yites! outta sight in pricing. This one fit the budget, its just the bust and the hairs not sharp that gets me lifting an eyebrow.
1922-D-Lincoln-Wheat-Cent-Graded-High?
1922-D-Lincoln-Wheat-Cent-Graded-High?
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
GrapeCollects's Avatar
United States
8938 Posts
 Posted 09/30/2018  10:39 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add GrapeCollects to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
hmm I agree but if the price fits, you musta bid!
Pillar of the Community
ty88ty2's Avatar
United States
772 Posts
 Posted 09/30/2018  11:02 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add ty88ty2 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I would say 63 or 64 BN. The only thing that bothers me is that weird light streak across Lincoln's chest... what exactly is that?
Rest in Peace
Crazyb0's Avatar
10197 Posts
 Posted 09/30/2018  11:03 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Crazyb0 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
TPG has it about right, must have bypassed that spot on lapel and called it "market acceptable" to go 64, I'd said 62 on obverse and 65 on reverse(unbalanced), that's a really nicely hit reverse there, best I've seen on a 22, maybe that why it's a 64, the reverse saves it. Sure don't like that corrosion spot, drawn too it. But it is Brown, very...wonder what environment it was kept in to turn like that, really deep?
Edited by Crazyb0
09/30/2018 11:05 pm
Pillar of the Community
luvmyCAM's Avatar
United States
1479 Posts
 Posted 09/30/2018  11:21 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add luvmyCAM to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Yes I won this on GC this afternoon, it looks like a nice coin hope in hand the smudge on bust is not as noticeable. I have been lurking about trying to find an RB at book and gave up. The sellers wanted too much over book for my tastes. In this instance I decided to go with a decent chocolate brown. The 64 Reds I saw were 7 and 8 hundred raw and really weren't that great looking more 63ish than 64 with dull red. This one is hard to find in MS. I didn't realize this until I started looking.
Bedrock of the Community
IndianGoldEagle's Avatar
United States
36558 Posts
 Posted 10/01/2018  09:00 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add IndianGoldEagle to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
64 seems right for this one.
Pillar of the Community
kanga's Avatar
United States
5825 Posts
 Posted 10/01/2018  09:00 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add kanga to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Nice coin.
I see 64.

For future reference use a dark, non-reflective background for you pics.
The coin will show up better.
The white background tend to overpower the light coming from the coin making it darker.
Pillar of the Community
SilverDollar2017's Avatar
United States
8715 Posts
 Posted 10/01/2018  09:11 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add SilverDollar2017 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
64 looks accurate from these pics.


Quote:
For future reference use a dark, non-reflective background for you pics.
The coin will show up better.
The white background tend to overpower the light coming from the coin making it darker.


I have a feeling these are the notoriously overexposed GC pics....but in hand pics will be appreciated, as the GC pics often can exaggerate minor flaws.
Bedrock of the Community
Learn More...
panzaldi's Avatar
United States
18635 Posts
 Posted 10/01/2018  09:20 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add panzaldi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
with the only flaws to affect grade being the two spots on the coat I'm at MS64BN
Pillar of the Community
luvmyCAM's Avatar
United States
1479 Posts
 Posted 10/01/2018  11:04 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add luvmyCAM to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks for the opinions yes these are gallery pics. When I get the coin will take and post some home shots. The reverse is what drew me in. I don't know what caused the dark toning must have been decades of what ever storage environment it was in. I once saw an old antique coin storage cabinet drawer it had multiple small individual drawers lined with green felt. Does anyone know how collectors stored coins before boards and booklets were available? The cabinet was home made and was in a home in Leavenworth KS. The owners told me relatives used it as such. Interesting, that was in 1972 and was an antique even then.
Bedrock of the Community
IndianGoldEagle's Avatar
United States
36558 Posts
 Posted 10/01/2018  11:14 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add IndianGoldEagle to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
When I started in the late 50's small envelopes were used when not in a coin folder.
Bedrock of the Community
Coinfrog's Avatar
United States
94367 Posts
 Posted 10/01/2018  11:53 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Coinfrog to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
64BN seems right to me as well.
Rest in Peace
T-BOP's Avatar
United States
18456 Posts
 Posted 10/01/2018  1:18 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add T-BOP to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
MS-64BN all day long .
Pillar of the Community
luvmyCAM's Avatar
United States
1479 Posts
 Posted 10/01/2018  6:17 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add luvmyCAM to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Im afraid I am no longer a full blown fringe die variety enthusiast somewhere somehow I morphed into the straight Lincoln series. The doubled dies just weren't giving me the wows anymore. Something about these early Lincoln's. Ive been bitten. How long will this phase last I can't tell yet?
Pillar of the Community
KenKat's Avatar
United States
4085 Posts
 Posted 10/01/2018  7:35 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add KenKat to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I think the reverse carried the day on this one, pushing it over the edge.
Bedrock of the Community
BadThad's Avatar
United States
19931 Posts
 Posted 10/01/2018  7:48 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add BadThad to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It gets the 64 because of the strike and eye appeal. The reverse is exceptional for the issue.
Lincoln Cent Lover!
VERDI-CARE™ INVENTOR
https://verdi.care/
  Previous TopicReplies: 18 / Views: 2,684Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.37 seconds to rattle this change. Forums