| Author |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,490 |
|
|
New Member
United States
29 Posts |
Edited by accprof1 10/10/2018 10:36 am
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36741 Posts |
Not the best photos to grade from, but it looks EF-45 to AU-50. Not sure about the surfaces as it might have been cleaned.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
I'm not sure how accurately I'm reading your images but I'm at EF45 maybe AU50. Is the lustre on it better than the images? As a side note it is a reverse die of 1878 which is not nearly as common as the slanted arrow feather reverse of 1879.
|
|
New Member
 United States
29 Posts |
Aside from the part that is toned, it has nice luster that the pics are not capturing very well.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36741 Posts |
Hard to tell with the lighting in these new photos if the surface has been cleaned. 80-CC is a better date and worth getting slabbed.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
AU-53.  to the CCF!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8715 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
683 Posts |
IMO XF cleaned, would need better pictures for a more accurate grade.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11880 Posts |
Looks like a dipped and retoning au
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18660 Posts |
AU53/55 poor lighting and out of focus photo makes it difficult to determine original surfaces but it does appear to have been cleaned
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
AU details cleaned. Really difficult to grade from your photos. From your photos the coin appears to have been cleaned and retoned.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12057 Posts |
AU50 details, cleaned, and as Dave noted, the scarcer parallel arrow feather (PAF) reverse of 1878. It's also an overdate (80/79).
I don't think it looks all that bad, probably better in hand, and this is a far sight better than my own example of the same coin!
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,490 |
|