Quote:
Gold can only mean it actually grades higher than it did and may actually be strong for that higher grade.
At minimum it has to be something they would sticker at the next highest grade for a gold sticker. They don't just give gold for something they think would be a low end upgrade.
Quote: So is the
TPG correct or CAC?
That's up to the person to decide, most think CAC is when it comes to gold stickers as they are so rare and so stingy with them.
Quote:
Where do "+" grades fall in comparison to green and gold?
+ grades are irrelevant for green vs gold. Gold means it is undergraded in their eyes
Quote:
What would an MS-67+ Gold CAC look like and what should it actually grade without the marketing?
It would look like a lock very nice 68 and more likely a 69. Golds at that grade range are like EXTREMELY rare.
Quote:
The 70-point scale seems to be completely inadequate.
It always has been because of a fatal flaw from day one. It isn't a 70 point scale at all. It's a scale of 1-58+, that has a scale of 60-70 sitting on top of it. The whole hard line of friction limiting something to a 58+ is dissapearing and that if there is no friction it has to be a 60 or better is also fading, but many still hold onto that idea.
It should have always been a continuous scale instead of two separate ones combined into one.
Quote:
Give it a few more years, they will figure something they've only been here since 2007.
CAC yes, JA the man behind CAC and the reason why it has been so successful has been a leading expert for decades. He was also one of the founders of PCGS and NGC. People have tried to replicate CAC, none have come close to the widespread market acceptance CAC has.