| Author |
Replies: 37 / Views: 4,596 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3507 Posts |
Hi Seattle,
You said...
"I want to reinforce the fact that although there may be a street definition of a term and a numismatic definition of it, that for the benefit of the hobby and the understanding of everyone, we should move away from relying on such terms and move to more universally understood ones."
This is a difficult one to do.
A "strike" at the mint can be the actual manufacture of a coin. That would, of course be a numismatic definition.
OR:-)
A "strike" at the Mint could be a bunch of workers outside the facility walking around with picket signs. That's a fair street definition:-)
There will be terms in any hobby, or job , or for that matter just about anything else where terms used in one area of life will mean one thing and yet are accepted definitions for completely different things in a hobby or job.
For a logger, pitch as a noun is tree sap. For a baseball player, the word pitch as a verb means to toss the ball. As a noun it's the ball itself as it is flying through the air. It also means tree sap as they used to put pitch on a baseball bat years ago. OH, OH, baseball uses the word "strike" too. You can see where I'm going:-)
It doesn't seem that changing the terms so that they can't be confused would be the way to go. I think the context in which the words are used should be the key to the definitions. It's up to us not to confuse them.
Thanks, Bill
Edited by foundinrolls 07/30/2008 7:31 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
405 Posts |
Ya, I guess the idea of moving away from terms which have context specific meanings is sort of unrealistic and simply a part of our language we can't avoid. How about instead, we invent a new language specifically for numismatics?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
526 Posts |
Actually the quote by Amazon99 is not completely correct either. It does not take multiple hubbings to create a doubled die. The single squeeze process of hubbing is proof of that.
BJ Neff
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3507 Posts |
Hi Seattle, Nah...let's keep the words we use for numismatics and let everyone else change ;-) Have Fun, Bill
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7629 Posts |
So then if we change to the following:
doubled die - gnorkle repunched mintmarks - gimble variety - plash die variety - hurkle error - quiggle
then we could say:
All gnorkles are hurkles as are all gimbles. It might be possible to have a hurkle on a quiggle or a plash, but certainly not all plashes can be considered hurkles just as not all quiggles have hurkles or plashes. It is possible, however, to have a single coin that's a hurkle, quiggle, and plash, whether it be a gnorkle or a gimble.
I think I'd rather stick to terms that, while can be confusing to those who don't have the education, still make perfect sense to all those who do. For those who cannot make sense of it on their own, they need to have an open mind and go to those who do know for their education. I have never met a true numismatist who wouldn't share their knowledge with others who were genuinely interested in learning.
Edited by coppercoins 07/31/2008 5:20 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
405 Posts |
Quote: All gnorkles are hurkles as are all gimbles. It might be possible to have a hurkle on a quiggle or a plash, but certainly not all plashes can be considered hurkles just as not all quiggles have hurkles or plashes. It is possible, however, to have a single coin that's a hurkle, quiggle, and plash, whether it be a gnorkle or a gimble. See - so much more clear! I want to add this quote into my sig - unfortunately it's too big :(
Edited by seattleMD 07/31/2008 5:32 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1450 Posts |
WHEW! I will have to be more careful about the cans of worms I open! This is great stuff but it made me tired. Really, this was wonerfully informative. Thanks! p.s.:Don't let your gorkle plash unless you gimble it first...or something like that 
|
| |
Replies: 37 / Views: 4,596 |