| Author |
 Replies: 18 / Views: 2,520 |
|
New Member
United States
6 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
900 Posts |
Hard to tell from those pictures, but it looks like it has been cleaned. VF 35 details. A good way to compare is to scroll through the images on this link. You'll have to scroll way down to find a comparable example. |
|
Moderator
 United States
189603 Posts |
 to the Community! |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
747 Posts |
Welcome to the forum!
I'd have to guess VF details, need better pics.
Edited by NDBirdman
12/24/2018 01:21 am
|
|
Moderator
United States
14463 Posts |
I moved your post to the appropriate grading section for the proper attention.  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18702 Posts |
VF35 details. coin appears to have been cleaned. this will affect value, however, it is a rarer coin and will bring a decent price. I think its still north of $1000 |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
(High) VF details (cleaned/polished). to the CCF! |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8715 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36845 Posts |
|
|
New Member
 United States
6 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1788 Posts |
The '96-o at best looks low AU details, cleaned
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
747 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18702 Posts |
 looks polished |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
89CC - VF details cleaned 96 O - AU details cleaned Both the coins have the look of being cleaned/polished. On the 89CC you may want to consider sending in to TPG for grading to confirm it is genuine as there are so many key date fakes. The mint mark and date position appears correct on the 89CC. |
| |
Replies: 18 / Views: 2,520 |
Posted 12/22/2018 11:01 pm
