| Author |
Replies: 12 / Views: 4,528 |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36828 Posts |
I know there are a few experts here at CCF that are sharp on this series. Is this a genuine coin or do you see red flags for fake?  
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
Spain
125 Posts |
Could you please show us the edge and the weight?
I don't see anything wrong at first, but these two parameters are important.
Regards
|
|
Valued Member
186 Posts |
IndianGoldEagle It does look suspicioius but I don't want to say more since this(8 reales!!) is not my playground!Here's mine of which I'm sure it's 100% genuine!  
Edited by paulCT 01/05/2019 08:10 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
36828 Posts |
txabs I am unable to post anything other than these two seller photos, it's not my coin. My concern was the frosty surfaces like a newly issued coin, but flat details with possible artificial aging. I am looking for one of these right now and was considering this coin. My gut says something is not right but I can't nail it down.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
36828 Posts |
paulCT, your coin is nice and there is nothing to make me think it is not genuine.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1915 Posts |
I'm no expert either, but I have fakes and it looks like a good coin to me.
|
|
Valued Member
186 Posts |
IndianGoldEagle Thanks!The coin posted by you appears as an ended ebay listing!As I said before it looks a bit funny(maybe it's just the wear!), but I could be 100% wrong therefore i'd rather wait for someone that really knows the subject!!Let's hope that swamperbob or realeswatcher will see this topic!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1156 Posts |
I hope you didn't buy it. It has a chop or test mark on the obverse so someone suspected a silver plated counterfeit. Also the seam along the obverse rim from 1:00 to 5:00 is indicative of a silver plated edge.
Edited by jgenn 01/06/2019 6:15 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5362 Posts |
IndianGoldEagle The coin is on ebay I believe and it is a Numismatic Forgery I have been watching. The coin is most likely an injection molded casting in white metal artificially aged. The image on the molds is from a genuine coin. I own dozens of examples all have the same general characteristics. Note in particular the arc along the edge of the coin where the words DEI GRATIA are located. This line is where the die face ends which is short of the edge of the planchet. That can not happen on a genuine strike in an open sided screw press because the die face was larger than the planchet itself. Notice on PaulCT's 1804 coin that it is an off center strike and the entire dentil length is visible along the word GRATIA. The dentils are long and lozenge shaped with TAPERS at both ends. The die itself has an entire circle of dentils this long. The planchet actually fits INSIDE the outer circumference of the dentils. However on the first coin shown the die face ends BEFORE the edge of the coin. There is absolutely NO CHANCE this coin is genuine. Avoid all coins with this feature - provided originals were struck in an OPEN SIDED PRESS.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1915 Posts |
This probably explains why I read someplace that some coin collectors may have as much as 10% counterfeit coins without knowing it. Based in photo alone it fooled me.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
36828 Posts |
swamperbob and jgenn, thank you for your responses. I have been watching this one on ebay and the dealer guarantees it to be 100% authentic. But, it just didn't look right to me. Looks like I will avoid this dealer as well since they don't know they are selling a fake. The search continues for one of these.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5362 Posts |
Albert You may have heard something similar to that in some of my posts. I was trained as an authenticator in the 1970s and have been at it on and off, first as a part timer then as a full timer, for most of the time since. Actually ebay was my last 40+ hour a week job as an authenticator and that used ONLY photos. Since first encountering ebay in 1999, I have become adept at the clues visible in pictures. In hand authentication is of course much easier and far more certain. I do not ascribe to the theory that a coin MUST be in hand to determine if it is a counterfeit/forgery. I would agree it is much better to be able to see and test the coin in person but you can not simply discard results from photos as some people do. Authentication has a learning curve. The longer you do it the better you become. No one is perfect. Typically when I review groups of 8 Reales I do find counterfeits - the rate varies according to the expertise an familiarity of the collector with the methods used to make 8Rs. I did a large dealer's personal collection of over 200 Portrait 8Rs and found 19 counterfeits/forgeries. This fellow was an average collector and had never developed a specialized understanding of the Portrait 8R. Other collectors have faired much worse, but again that is dependent on how they were educated. Before I started my book project, I reviewed my own collection of Portrait 8Rs in great detail. Some of the boxes of coin had not been reviewed in 30 years or more. I found 4 coins from my own collection that I had gotten wrong. Proving what I said above that we all make mistakes. I will do a quick review of anyone's collection from photographs at no charge provided I can use the photos in the future. A complete written finding and description of each coin will typically cost $5 each. In hand reviews are undertaken at a cost plus basis but tests and costs are disclosed first. The cost starts at $5 per coin plus shipping costs both ways.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1915 Posts |
I rely on having a coin in hand and testing it with my own tools. Here we normally have a photo alone with unknown accuracy if weights & measures are sometimes included. I often thought of having a service by mail but decided against it. There are so many pictures of coins we see here, it's too bad most people don't have a lab or shop populated with the right tools to settle their own questions. No doubt they obtain these so infrequently, they don't see a need to invest in equipment. But in my case, it's my hobby. Many coins we see here could easily be characterized in minutes. But there is so much separation between my shop and the owners with questionable coins. And from previous posts I have almost given up on authenticity claims based on photos. I should have never commented on this coin so that proves my point. I have many fakes some would say are genuine and I have genuine coins some would say are fakes. So it's hard for me.
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 4,528 |
|