Thanks for the clarification, Conder. Many of the coins that I submit to SEGS are what average collectors view as problem pieces, damaged. High grade coins, I send to PCGS, of course.
Here's an example of a coin I submitted to SEGS. Even though the coin is a relatively scarce variety, it's the counterstamp that I find important.
J.J. OUTLEY was a daguerreian, a.k.a.
ARTIST, who was active in St. Louis in the 1850's. Fewer than ten of his counterstamped coins have been recorded.



Note that I simply had the counterstamp and the "Huge O" variety noted. These aspects are what's important for this piece. If this coin was in Mint State, the counterstamp would be a major detractor.
Getting back to our OP's coin, the date and likely the variety are insignificant. The "money shot" is that it's a rare error. The condition is self-evident. With pieces like this, I think it important to accentuate the positive aspects, that which make them rare and desirable to collectors who seek a particular genre. After all, how many collectors will ever own a brockage large cent in any condition?
P.S. - I appreciate the SEGS holders above all others. I find them to be the most durable and scratch resistant. Also, they're relatively inexpensive and boast a "top read" label.