Handfull Of Morgans

1880O - VF20 (lower than VF30 stated)
1882O - Fine details with damage (lower than VF20 stated)
1884O - F12 (as stated)
1885 - VF details with rim damage
1885O - VG10 (lower than stated F12)
1888 - G4 (if all letters are readable, AG3 if not) (lower than stated VG8)
1888O F12 (as stated)
1889S VG8 (as stated)
1891O - VG10 (as stated)
1892S - VG8 (as stated)
1894S - AG3 (as stated)
1896 - F12 (lower than stated VF20)
1896O - F12 (lower than stated VF20)
1900O - VG8 (lower than stated F12)
1921 - AU50 (as stated)
1921S - VF25 (lower than stated EF40)

Keep in mind these are just my opinion.

1880-O F-12/VF-20
1882-O VG-08 (damage on face?)
1884-O VG-08
1885 Damaged, net F-12
1885-O G-06
1888 G-04
1888-0 F-12/15
1889-S AG-02
1891-O VG-08/10
1892-S G-04
1894-S AG-02/3
1896 F-12/15
1896-O VG-08/10
1900-O VG-08/10
1921 XF-40/45
1921-S VF-20/25

This was a real quick look-through using my own collection (mostly PCGS slabs) for reference, so my grades are certainly open for debate. Grading from pictures is difficult, a rough estimate at best and I didn't look too closely for damage nor cleaning except the 1885 which is clearly damaged. None of the top four TPGs show any mercy with Morgans. Almost all raw coins on ebay are over-graded by the sellers; in many instances, they are waaaaay over-graded. In most instances with these particular Morgans, one or two grades down won't significantly change the value.

NOTES: I didn't peek at Susan's grades so I wouldn't be influenced. Also, with numerous images of the same type coins, it is difficult to resist comparative grading with the others rather than from an outside standard. And, pictures through plastic distort the surfaces and there may be marks on the plastic cover which are not on the coin. Ain't nuthin' like a coin in the hand for grading.

Thanks for the input MorganFred and CC... I love the name, CommonCents.