Coin Community Family of Web Sites
Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer 300,000 items to help build your collection! Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Shop CCF Members on eBay! Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes.








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Why Do 1983 Pennies Seem Different From Other Coins Of That Year?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 1,456Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community
wulffy11's Avatar
United States
543 Posts
 Posted 05/04/2019  7:39 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add wulffy11 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
1983 coins were the tough year to find in high grade, largely because it was a year where no uncirculated sets were made. It seems it was a poor quality strike year as well so there's lots of worn ones and the higher grades are scarce. Why is it, though, that 1983 cents are the only denomination not carrying a swift premium? The nickels, dimes, quarters and halves are astronomically high by comparison.
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
GrapeCollects's Avatar
United States
8938 Posts
 Posted 05/05/2019  5:10 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add GrapeCollects to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
For the 1983 zinc since it was the first year they ever had to deal with zinc only strikes they started striking zinc cents in late 1982 and they had some issues with it which is why we had the large and small date varieties. The other denominations mostly the quarter, have high premiums because not many Mint State or high Mint state examples were saved.
Pillar of the Community
cladking's Avatar
United States
2270 Posts
 Posted 05/05/2019  8:29 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add cladking to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
1983 coins were the tough year to find in high grade, largely because it was a year where no uncirculated sets were made. It seems it was a poor quality strike year as well so there's lots of worn ones and the higher grades are scarce. Why is it, though, that 1983 cents are the only denomination not carrying a swift premium? The nickels, dimes, quarters and halves are astronomically high by comparison.


I've always wondered this too.

I believe it's because so many millions of the cents were saved and there are very few collectors who realize what a tiny percentage of rolls will even have any chBU's. There just aren't many real collectors of any moderns and the few around can find a nice specimen (or think they can).

Funny thing is almost all the cents in privately packaged 1983 mint sets are spotty or otherwise unattractive.

I'm told roll searchers don't have that much trouble locating enough choice specimens for the weak demand. My guess is that these are scarcer in choice condition than most of the cents from the '30's but there's lots of demand for the older coins.
Time don't fly, it bounds and leaps.
Edited by cladking
05/05/2019 8:30 pm
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts
 Posted 05/06/2019  09:47 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add just carl to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
After 1982 pennies were made so bad that for a long time they all looked like Mint errors. So many had bubbly services that people thought they had an illness.
Bedrock of the Community
BadThad's Avatar
United States
19931 Posts
 Posted 05/06/2019  8:36 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add BadThad to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Part of the reason is the false belief by nearly every dealer (and many collectors) on the planet is you can easily find MS-67 and up coins everywhere because they made billions. The majority of collectors are fine with the 64 and lesser coins that constitute most of the 1983's. The combination of these two things keep the prices suppressed.
Lincoln Cent Lover!
VERDI-CARE™ INVENTOR
https://verdi.care/
Pillar of the Community
cladking's Avatar
United States
2270 Posts
 Posted 05/06/2019  10:01 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add cladking to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply


Quote:
Part of the reason is the false belief by nearly every dealer (and many collectors) on the planet is you can easily find MS-67 and up coins everywhere because they made billions. The majority of collectors are fine with the 64 and lesser coins that constitute most of the 1983's. The combination of these two things keep the prices suppressed.


I doubt most collectors even have an MS-64 for this date. At least the way I grade them most '83 cents look like junk. You could pull the nicest one in a hundred and it might still be ugly.
Time don't fly, it bounds and leaps.
  Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 1,456Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.28 seconds to rattle this change. Forums