| Author |
Replies: 17 / Views: 2,745 |
|
Valued Member
United States
101 Posts |
I am wondering if there is any difference in the coins other than the fields of the coin being different. any other differences? any help would be great. thanks   
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
The rims on a proof are squared off.The coins themselves are very shiny. I can not tell from your pics. John1 
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
Can't really tell from your photos but they don't look like proofs to me . I'm assuming an original 1937 proof set would be exhibiting some real nice toning which yours do not . also they just don't have that stand alone uniqueness of proof quality coins . 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
70 Posts |
It's hard to be certain based on the pictures, but they don't look like proofs to me. As has been pointed out, the rims on the proof coins are very distinctive. Attached is a picture of my 1942 proof Walker for comparison. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6524 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Can you pop the top off the holder and give us a nice close-up of a couple of them, preferably the quarter and half?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21786 Posts |
Proofs of this period have sharper edges, were struck at greater pressure or double struck from new dies, to ensure perfect rendering of the design detail. They do not have polished fields or cameoed design details. The original intention for a poof was to make the best example possible as a quality control standard, to be compared with normal production business strikes.
It is these characteristics that a collector should look for, when assessing if what you have is proof or not. That is why high quality pictures are needed for this thread. They are much rarer than made for market modern proof coins.
That is not the case any more.
Modern proofs generally speaking have polished fields and cameoed design details to be more attractive to the modern collector. They are usually made in much larger volumes for a commercial market, and are thus heavily marketed.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
261 Posts |
Don't alter the holder. Take the best pics you can through the plastic.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
C'mon. These holders pop apart easily - no need to remove the coins from the bottom half for pics. 
Edited by Coinfrog 06/07/2019 10:19 pm
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
 OP's coins are in a $1 plastic holder . You can pop it open with your finger nail . 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
101 Posts |
hi, thank you for all the help on what an early proof set looks like. mine is not. I did pop the case off and was a bit more enlightened by lack of sharpness to edges, condition also. take care,   
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
They seem to be quite high-grade in any event!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
12815 Posts |
Thanks for sharing. Nice coins!
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
When in doubt always ask us . That's why this forum exists, for helping out our fellow coin collectors . 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21786 Posts |
As far as condition is concerned, quite a nicely balanced set anyway. 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187702 Posts |
A nice looking set, in my opinion. 
|
| |
Replies: 17 / Views: 2,745 |