| Author |
 Replies: 29 / Views: 3,867 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
614 Posts |
This one is a little unusual looking (tone/color)to me, what say you guys.   |
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I'll throw out MS-64+ PL, unsure if DM from these pics.
Edited by Coinfrog
07/03/2019 7:13 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11898 Posts |
65 could be pl or dmpl  |
|
Valued Member
United States
261 Posts |
No idea!
Anywhere from AUpl to 64pl...
It's a great coin IMO
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1267 Posts |
MS-64 with a nice cameo contrast.
Might make pl, which would require the mirrors to have from 2 to 4 inches of clear reflectivity.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Can you show us some reflectively images, please.
Edited by Coinfrog
07/03/2019 7:44 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
614 Posts |
These are tough to take, but the best I can do, I did the newspaper deal, but in hand they are clearer.   |
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8938 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
That coin appears to have a lot of virgin frost and high appeal to go with a nice strike. I can't comment on the PL or DMPL aspect but it looks MS65 to me and 66 would not surprise anyone. MS65+PL would be my guess.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18700 Posts |
at least MS64+PL & possible DMPL (tough to call in photos). could make 65 but i'd like to see the cheek area and neck closer to determine if its just superficial rub from being in a bag or if they are light digs or scratches there.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
614 Posts |
When this is over, I'm going crack that coin out and send it to PCGS the last voucher I have, I won the coin at $68 at auction, and then Ill never submit a coin again, too much politics
Edited by farrider11
07/04/2019 7:30 pm
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
314 Posts |
Looks Ms-64 to me, although the exact state of the surfaces is difficult to make out.
Could be MS-65 I suppose, but hits on the cheek, nose, neck, and 9 to 11 o'clock on the obverse keep it from a chance at 66.
Given the abundance of choice examples of this date, it may have been conservatively graded.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9793 Posts |
MS63PL
"Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013! ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1981, ANS, Early American Coppers Member (EAC), Colonial Coin Collectors Club member (C4), Conder Token Collector Club member (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS) member, Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC) & Numismatic Bibliomania Society member (NBS), USMex, Member in good standing, 2¢ variety collector. See my want page: http://goccf.com/t/140440 |
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
Obvious scuffing on the cameo detracts from the eye appeal somewhat.
Some would say the scuffing is tantamount to wear, some would not.
My opinion? (for what it's worth),
because the fields are reasonably clean,
MS63PL. (but not DMPL)
Probably would have been MS65PL without the scuffing.
Edited by sel_69l
07/05/2019 06:47 am
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
MS63 possibly 64. The reverse fields look a little hazy so it may have missed a PL designation.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
314 Posts |
I'll second Dave's opinion
|
| |
Replies: 29 / Views: 3,867 |
Posted 07/03/2019 7:20 pm
