Very neat find! Constans as caesar is tough to find in general, especially so for the two standards type. I'm curious to know about rhe IVN... in the late Roman period, does that imply that he was named after another Constans, or just that he was young/youthful?
I wonder if it could also be an engraver's error? Leave out a couple letters and you've turned CONSTANTINVS IVN into CONSTANS IVN - wouldn't be the first known engraver's error from this period.
I wonder if it could also be an engraver's error? Leave out a couple letters and you've turned CONSTANTINVS IVN into CONSTANS IVN - wouldn't be the first known engraver's error from this period.



























