| Author |
 Replies: 11 / Views: 1,731 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
122 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4618 Posts |
LOL! I thought you had something wrong in the title for the post, but that's as close to a 1904 LWC as I've ever seen. It's post strike damage that happens to be on the third number of the date. Someone has used a punch or a drill bit on the coin and it made a raised area around the indention. Thanks for posting it. Sorry it's just damaged. ANA ID: 3203813 - CONECA ID: N-5637 Clean a coin that may be worth collecting? Please DON'T! When in doubt, leave it dirty!! 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
12477 Posts |
I like that.  It almost looks like someone was intentionally trying to alter the date to 1904. In Memory of Crazyb0 12-26-1951 to 7-27-2020
In Memory of Tootallious 3-31-1964 to 4-15-2020
In Memory of T-BOP 10-12-1949 to 1-19-2024
|
|
Moderator
United States
56855 Posts |
1904 would be an IHC not a LWC. It is PMD. John1  |
|
Moderator
United States
15472 Posts |
Fun novelty item.
Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.art |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1070 Posts |
Hahaha 1904 wheat would be something
|
|
Valued Member
United States
261 Posts |
Funny. Now that's something I would keep.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
The odds of finding that in the wild are astounding!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4963 Posts |
I think I see the corners of a 4 peeking out.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
A fun post. I thought you had bought the ultimate black book coin!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
74662 Posts |
Not from 1904, but the damage is still funny!  Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
745 Posts |
It was a 1944-S. You can tell from the mintmark style. It it the style used in 1943 through 1944.
Tim Hughes
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,731 |
|
Posted 08/28/2019 02:14 am
