| Author |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,879 |
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
448 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8938 Posts |
AU58 or MS62 Reverse Center is Weakly struck
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4911 Posts |
MS-63..maybe 64 depending how the cheek looks in hand.
Feel free to call me Will.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
MS-63. Eye Appeal 7/10. I like that one.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
I agree with GrapeCollects AU58 or MS62. From the pictures, the patina may be hiding a tiny amount of wear and tiny nick and scratches. Hard to tell.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2495 Posts |
MS64 all day long and certainly nothing lower.
I'll buy 100's of these at au58 prices if you've got them.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
5591 Posts |
Unless the marks on the monarch and canoe patrons are on the holder and not the coin, then 60-62 .. and then only if the wear on the hair and shoulders of the canoe passengers and monarch is due to a weak strike and not actual wear. Then I'd go 58.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2495 Posts |
ICCS grading = obverse fields.
How many times must this be said.
ICCS ms64, all day long.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Agree ICCS would not grade this lower than 64.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
64 Posts |
Nice eye appeal, going with MS 63.
|
|
Valued Member
 Canada
448 Posts |
It was marked 65.00 but I got it for 55.00 and a large double double from timmys. Think it was a decent deal
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1622 Posts |
With the marks on the kings face and neck...MS63
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1463 Posts |
Dig In Kings hair at the front would keep this in the 63 range imo
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
851 Posts |
Beautiful example!
I love the aged toning. It adds to the eye appeal and history of this well kept coin. Keep it safe!
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,879 |
|