| Author |
 Replies: 15 / Views: 1,574 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1988 Posts |
repunched 5 sorry for the glare   |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
857 Posts |
Probably only got an EF-45 from ICCS but I think it's probably closer to an AU-55
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1625 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
9879 Posts |
EF40
Should be 45
Too much wear for AU.
It's undergraded.
Otherwise you wouldn't be asking for a grade in the "you VS." format.
"Dipping" is not considered cleaning...
-from PCGS website
Edited by DBM
12/06/2019 8:15 pm
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
402 Posts |
DBM seems quite insightful....my vote with him
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1928 Posts |
I'm thinking EF-45 - AU- 50
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I'm going to stick my nose out and say AU-53.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1463 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21789 Posts |
I will jump into Coinfrog's pond.
Wear on the leaves and hair around Vikkie's ear suggest
AU53.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
576 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
A little too much glare really but, looks like it may go AU55
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
1988 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2302 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21789 Posts |
I don't get it right all of the time.
Neither do the Third Party Graders.
That is why we all should learn to grade for ourselves.
On reconsideration, I am still happy with
AU53.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One problem with third Party graders that requires some consideration:
The submitter gets a better than expected grade for the coin,
= probable repeat business.
The submitter gets a much lower grade than expected,
= probable business for another grader.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
When the graders do their thing at ICCS they have the raw coin in 'hand', makes a lot of difference grading on a computer screen and through plastic so yes, it's never going to come out right the way we do it.  And, I think they missed this one. Edited by SHAFTA9a
12/09/2019 2:51 pm
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,574 |
|
Posted 12/06/2019 8:11 pm
