I think it's the sort of a neat number that I would have saved, but probably not quite neat enough to have much value, if any - not in this condition, anyway.
(That said, there's less than a thousand possible AABBBBCC numbers, so it's a pretty rare pattern.)
Ironically enough, I suspect that it would probably have been more popular if the quad in the middle had been two pairs instead (making it an AABBCCDD pattern).