| Author |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,552 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
68 Posts |
If you have rare coins rapped in original uncirculated condition , do they loose value compared to proof sets? I have some that are classified as the most sought after and they are in us treasure uncirculated packages . How do I verify before I start buying a new FARM...... THANKS FOR HELP
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
 to CCF. Can you post photos? John1 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34397 Posts |
@coinindrum, first welcome to CCF. Second, yes pictures or even a description of these "most sought after" coins would be a good starting point. I look forward to seeing what you have.
Your question about whether a proof or an uncirculated coin would be worth more doesn't have a simple yes/no answer.
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
24885 Posts |
 To the Forum.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
68 Posts |
Thanks for welcoming 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
68 Posts |
Here is another 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
Can you show a picture of the whole package. If these are original government sets then you have Mint sets that are worth $6 to $8 each. The two coins shown are not rare and if removed from the sets would be worth 10 to 20 cents retail. I think you may be confusing these Philadelphia struck business strikes for the No S Proof coins. These are NOT proofs.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
68 Posts |
Thanks for clarification . yes they are complete unopened uncirculated sets. That's what I needed to hear . I'm still a bit confused how the complete set of 1975 SF SET have no mint mark on them even the Eisenhower and penny,nickel ,quarter, dime, nor half. The Denver set all have mint marks. Again thanks for the lesson
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1543 Posts |
Because they are from Philadelphia not San Francisco.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts |
 And no your not rich.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
 To CCF , yes sorry for bursting your bubble . 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
68 Posts |
 thanks for all the information Yes it was nice to STAR GAZE and have my hand on the cookie platter That is why I sought out the forum and truly appreciate the knowledge and help  I am quite sure to have many lows but the help I can gain from enthusiasts here will build that platform to blow that bubble right out of the sky Even if it is a tiny bubble 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
68 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
Those are what are called Special Mint Sets. From 1965 to 1967 the mint did not make regular mint sets or proof sets. They made Special Mint Sets(SMS) that are a kind of "hybrid" of the two. They are better than typical uncirculated coins but not as high a quality as proof coins. The 1965 sets were packaged in Pliofilm similar to the 1955 to 64 proof sets. The 66 and 67 sets were in hard plastic holders. None of the 1965 to 67 coins had mintmarks in either the sets or circulation coins. The mint stopped using mintmarks in those years because it was thought that it would keep coin collectors from hoarding coins (There was a major coin shortage at the time and the government blamed it on coin collectors. They even went so far as to consider legislation to make coin collecting illegal.)
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
68 Posts |
Thanks for the information, Back to the vault they go
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,552 |
|