Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
300,000 items to help build your collection! Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Specializing in Modern Numismatics Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Double Eagle. Proof Or Proof-Like?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 1,485Next Topic  
New Member

United States
39 Posts
 Posted 02/20/2020  9:37 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add jbohanon to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Would appreciate some opinions on this coin. I've had two graders look at it and say they think it's an impaired proof. I've also had other dealers take a look and claim it's just proof-like. I know it's hard to judge without coin in hand, but one thing a few of them have said is that the reeding is different on proofs. I haven't been able to find any details on this as proof 20s are quite rare. Trying to decide if it's worth submitting. If it's clearly not a proof is there still some premium if it gets a PL designation?

There is definitely reflectivity on both sides and no obvious signs of cleaning.


Double-Eagle.-Proof-Or-Proof-Like?
Double-Eagle.-Proof-Or-Proof-Like?
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
GrapeCollects's Avatar
United States
8938 Posts
 Posted 02/20/2020  9:41 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add GrapeCollects to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'd say Obv. PL reverse SPL. Not a proof IMO.
Bedrock of the Community
Coinfrog's Avatar
United States
94367 Posts
 Posted 02/20/2020  10:21 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Coinfrog to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Impaired even if proof, which I doubt.
Bedrock of the Community
sel_69l's Avatar
Australia
21786 Posts
 Posted 02/21/2020  01:36 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add sel_69l to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The luster helps make this coin, but
there are lots of tiny nicks and scratches which gives emphasis to the 'impaired' wording, even it it is a proof, of which I am also inclined to doubt.

No wear, so definitely some sort of MS grade.
Lovely coin, nevertheless.

I don't know about American proof gold coins,
but British gold coins have almost a 'cutting' feel to their edge milling. Gold is soft. That 'cutting' feel can very quickly dissipate, with even the slightest handling, with high MS gold coins, and this coin has obviously been handled quite a bit.
Pillar of the Community
thecoinguy1964's Avatar
United States
1302 Posts
 Posted 02/21/2020  6:46 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add thecoinguy1964 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
An impaired Proof coin is one that has condition issues. It is one that may have scratches or problems with its surfaces that would render the coin less than desirable to a collector. An impaired Proof coin may even show signs of circulation and wear. Proof coins are graded similarly to the ways that we grade other coins.
I'd never heard of impaired proof coin, but upon reading & copy/pasting the above definition, it's a far cry from being a proof.
Pillar of the Community
CoinCollector2012's Avatar
United States
8137 Posts
 Posted 02/21/2020  11:56 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add CoinCollector2012 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
This one doesn't look like a proof to me. It doesn't have squared rims, and the details are not as sharp as the ones I've seen on other proofs.
Pillar of the Community
Ballyhoo's Avatar
United States
1613 Posts
 Posted 02/23/2020  8:26 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Ballyhoo to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I cross referenced it with a few proofs at PCGS and it does not appear to be one. Keep in mind, only 86 were struck so I'd think that would narrow it down. As for the last question, yes Proof-like designations command a higher resale value. No matter the case, a beauty for sure.
ANA member - PAN Member - BCCS Member
There are no problems only solutions - the late, great John Lennon
  Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 1,485Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.38 seconds to rattle this change. Forums