| Author |
 Replies: 14 / Views: 1,904 |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11881 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8938 Posts |
AU-55+ Details Cleaned. The impressions are a die clash.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
11881 Posts |
Quote:
The impressions are a die clash aren't clashed elements raised? these look depressed...  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11881 Posts |
seems more likely that there was something between the die and the planchet when the coin was struck
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7028 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5668 Posts |
AU details. Why would there be a die clash on the devices? Hard to tell if it's incuse or raised on the neck, but it also looks like there are some depressions on the reverse. Defective planchet?
Edited by Zurie
03/03/2020 12:09 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
In any event, AU details (cleaned).
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18662 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36744 Posts |
I'll wait for new photos on this one. Could be an MS coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
857 Posts |
Looks natural to me, I would have guessed MS-64
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11881 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5668 Posts |
Interesting coin. I'd say MS-62 with the new pics. I suppose struck through is a possibility, but it doesn't seem to affect the devices on the reverse, so I still think they might be planchet defects. But just a guess.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Looks much better in these pics. Defective planchet sounds plausible. Never seen anything like it.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36744 Posts |
MS-63, must of had crud on the die surfaces of both sides.
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,904 |
|
Posted 03/02/2020 9:15 pm
