Posted 03/04/2020 4:09 pm
Here is the reason why it is not listed:
http://doubleddie.com/1827525.html
That is why. It was from a doubled master die.
I've not heard of this before, so I would save it and put his listing on the 2X2. They were from all three mints, but I've not see them before.
http://doubleddie.com/1827525.html
Quote:
1982-P 25˘ WMDO-001 Master Die Doubling
Description: A spread towards the center along with significant extra thickness shows on IGWT and slightly on the date.
Die Markers: Obverse: Die markers will vary with the different working dies. Reverse: Die markers will vary with the different working dies.
Submitted By: John A. Wexler
Cross References: None known
Comments: Since the doubling is on the master die all 1982-P, 1982-D, and 1982-S Washington quarters will have this doubling. Apparent differences from coin to coin may result due to working hub wear, working die wear, and wear to the coins.
1982-P 25˘ WMDO-001 Master Die Doubling
Description: A spread towards the center along with significant extra thickness shows on IGWT and slightly on the date.
Die Markers: Obverse: Die markers will vary with the different working dies. Reverse: Die markers will vary with the different working dies.
Submitted By: John A. Wexler
Cross References: None known
Comments: Since the doubling is on the master die all 1982-P, 1982-D, and 1982-S Washington quarters will have this doubling. Apparent differences from coin to coin may result due to working hub wear, working die wear, and wear to the coins.
That is why. It was from a doubled master die.
I've not heard of this before, so I would save it and put his listing on the 2X2. They were from all three mints, but I've not see them before.
