| Author |
 Replies: 10 / Views: 1,369 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1694 Posts |
Just picked this one up. very cool VAM with a slight Clashed E and some cool clashing. Check out the nostril area. Grades AU-58 with some nice toning. Has some bag barks but some could be the lighting.    Edited by JasonKflo
05/30/2020 7:22 pm
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18670 Posts |
boy, I would not have put that coin in a straight holder. surface preservation is below average. it may not have been cleaning but it is scratched up pretty good.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8516 Posts |
 .  Oregon coin geek.....*** GO BEAVS ! ! ! ***
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1694 Posts |
I think they way it is photographed is showing a lot of the scratches , looking at the sellers store many of the Morgans including MS ones look quite similar.
if its bad though I have return privileges
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
I could see this barely sliding by with a straight grade, but not AU58.
AU55 tops. All of the marks aside, I like this one if the price is right!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1694 Posts |
detail is much better than a 55 , will have to see how bad the scratches are
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
Yea, that's true. Guess I'm just focusing too hard on the scratches. Maybe it will be better in hand!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
Hopefully it will look better in-hand and since it's in an old ANACS holder there's a good chance it will.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36746 Posts |
AU-55 details, far too many small field scratches.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1694 Posts |
Edited by JasonKflo
06/03/2020 10:55 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
I would have to agree with the AU58 on this one.
|
| |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,369 |
|
Posted 05/30/2020 6:42 pm
