| Author |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,590 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
442 Posts |
Sellers Pics  
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7618 Posts |
Looks kinda lifeless in those pictures. AU-58 would be my guess.
Better pictures might render a better opinion.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36738 Posts |
Easy MS-64. Had the reverse not had the large scrape above Trust, I'd be at 65.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
1273 Posts |
MS-65 is my best estimate from those photos.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
2223 Posts |
Hard to tell if it's AU or low MS. It appears to have BU fields but too many distracting hits/marks on the cheek and in the field. Not to steal your post, but here is my 78 CC for comparison purposes:   NGC gave it a 63. I think thats low.
Edited by southsav 07/24/2020 5:38 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Sorry, but you are stealing the thread - nice coin, but please start your own.
I'll say 64 on the OP's, but different pics would help - fields are kind of dark.
Edited by Coinfrog 07/24/2020 5:50 pm
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
I'm leaning more towards west's opinion, I'll say MS60 if the fields are as nice as they appear to be in the images.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
Looks MS-63 to me. Nice coin.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18657 Posts |
the breast is a little weak for this year. surface preservation and luster on the obverse is AVG-. obverse eye appeal is going to drag it down a bit. I dont think its bad enough to drop it to a 62 as most of what we are seeing on the cheek is rub and some minor scratches so I'm at MS63
|
|
Valued Member
United States
484 Posts |
Slider AU. Luster broken on the check, lots of bag marks.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5667 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1694 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
442 Posts |
Guesses are all over the place. I'm at 63-64 based on the pics. But PCGS, who had the advantage of having it in hand, gave it a 61. I still managed to get it. This and the 78s I posted will finish may goal of MS versions of all the 78 types. 8TF, 7/8, rev 79, ect. Got it for $370 with buyers premium. Just under retail for a 61 according to Numismedia. So I got a decent deal on a properly graded coin, or a great deal on an under graded one. I wanted all my 78 to be 63s, Just have to settle for a few that look good enough to be 63 in my eyes. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
2223 Posts |
 As long as you're happy, that's what counts.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
594 Posts |
Not stealing the show - nice comparison
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,590 |
|