| Author |
Replies: 10 / Views: 2,245 |
|
|
New Member
United States
37 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Reverse is nicked up as well. I'd say MS-63 tops.  to the CCF!
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Really,you guys think it make MS grade? I would say xf-45 to au-50 John1 
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
John , the 1965 Jeff's are known for very weak Monticello Buildings . That shouldn't be a factor in grading this coin . I have to agree with the frog on this one . 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19171 Posts |
I'm seeing a mid-stage obverse die--beginning to show its age. Reverse is a tad softer than current PCGS-graded MS66s and better. I could go with MS62, but barely. A good hole filler.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
Quote: I'm seeing a mid-stage obverse die--beginning to show its age.  I'll say MS-63 as well
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3207 Posts |
fields are nice, but a few too many big hits, MS63 IMO
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2340 Posts |
I'll say AU58-MS62 like you said...depends who sees it? smat
edit Great pic's btw!!
Edited by smat45 09/30/2020 09:16 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18673 Posts |
AU58 worn out reverse die
|
|
New Member
Brazil
25 Posts |
First off you cannot have an AU grade because of a weak die strike caused by a worn die. With that said there are too many nicks in the portrait then on the reverse there is a nick cutting the third pillar. This is a "Mint State" coin but in my opinion with all that is going on with the portrait MS 60 is the best I could give.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36782 Posts |
Aside from the strike issues, MS-63.
|
| |
Replies: 10 / Views: 2,245 |
|