| Author |
Replies: 9 / Views: 1,844 |
|
|
New Member
United States
39 Posts |
It's a nice 1805 Large Cent unfortunately it is damaged. I am wrestling with the question of should it be certified? I am leaning towards certification, I have worse in holders. I have a few coins like this, nice, but damaged or scratched and I have always wondered if it is worth the cost to have them graded. Opinions?  
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
I wouldn't bother doing it.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
171 Posts |
A TPG is not going to like that coin. What on earth did that to the poor coin? It's a shame.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5239 Posts |
The overall condition and damage are beyond dispute. What benefits would you get from certification? I don't see it enhancing the market value.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts |
Sure wonder why someone would do that.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5825 Posts |
Only if you have a special reason to have it slabbed. Its numismatic value doesn't merit the cost of slabbing.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Agree, save your money.  to the CCF!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2333 Posts |
 smat
|
|
New Member
 United States
39 Posts |
Thanks for the responses everybody! I'm going with the wisdom of the crowd.
Tom
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4415 Posts |
 to the CCF, Tom Quote: I'm going with the wisdom of the crowd. IMHO, wise choice, Tom. If this coin was a rare or scarce variety, it would likely be worth paying the certification fee. As an avid collector of counterstamped coins, damaged/details pieces, there's but a small percentage that warrant the expense of certification.
|
| |
Replies: 9 / Views: 1,844 |
|