Nice job of steering, SteveInTampa. Thank you. I signed in to study all I could of the three pages. I'm half convinced these justify sending to a TPG.
The closest match to either of mine is a note of the same denomination as my second posting ($4.00 there as opposed to $2.00 in this one). The auction piece is dated the tenth of May, 1775. It sold for $111.00 five years ago. Mine is dated May 9, 1776. The signatures are of different men. The inking on the auction piece is superior to mine. Is the auction instructive?
It would be obvious to anyone with my two notes in hand ($2 dated 19th of May, 1775 / $4 May 9, 1776) that the Philly printers (Hall & Sellers) radically downgraded the quality of their paper stock over those 12 months. My learning marches forward. How, I wonder still, could a layman like me arrive at a grade estimate suitable to weigh into a decision as to whether holder one of these? Coins seem so logical in comparison!
By the way, the note imaged above is a victim of light distortion, not stained. Its hue is consistent front and back.
Kevin
The closest match to either of mine is a note of the same denomination as my second posting ($4.00 there as opposed to $2.00 in this one). The auction piece is dated the tenth of May, 1775. It sold for $111.00 five years ago. Mine is dated May 9, 1776. The signatures are of different men. The inking on the auction piece is superior to mine. Is the auction instructive?
It would be obvious to anyone with my two notes in hand ($2 dated 19th of May, 1775 / $4 May 9, 1776) that the Philly printers (Hall & Sellers) radically downgraded the quality of their paper stock over those 12 months. My learning marches forward. How, I wonder still, could a layman like me arrive at a grade estimate suitable to weigh into a decision as to whether holder one of these? Coins seem so logical in comparison!
By the way, the note imaged above is a victim of light distortion, not stained. Its hue is consistent front and back.
Kevin





















