Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsJoin Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. 300,000 items to help build your collection!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Could These Be RPM's?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 801Next Topic  
New Member
Swampfox's Avatar
United States
18 Posts
 Posted 12/16/2008  01:08 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Swampfox to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I tried coppercoins site and for some reason I was unable to view his site. I'm not a Lincoln collector, so I don't know much about these things. Are these RPM or just damage?

Could-These-Be-RPM's?

Could-These-Be-RPM's?
Pillar of the Community
KurtS's Avatar
United States
5318 Posts
 Posted 12/16/2008  02:54 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add KurtS to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I would put good odds on the first one, not sure on the second.
Valued Member
ziggy9's Avatar
United States
499 Posts
 Posted 12/16/2008  11:33 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add ziggy9 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Hi
the first one looks like it may be 1964d-1MM-002 which I have linked to at coppercoins below.

http://www.coppercoins.com/lincoln/...ie_state=mds

Richard
Pillar of the Community
rockdude's Avatar
United States
1807 Posts
 Posted 12/16/2008  1:15 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add rockdude to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
ziggy9; does it matter that that m/m is not located in the same position as the one listed on coppercoins?
Pillar of the Community
KurtS's Avatar
United States
5318 Posts
 Posted 12/16/2008  1:39 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add KurtS to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The mm on the coin above is too close to the 9 to be 1964D-1MM-002
I took a look myself, but was unable to make a definitive ID.
Pillar of the Community
foundinrolls's Avatar
United States
3507 Posts
 Posted 12/16/2008  5:58 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add foundinrolls to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
No and No....Whatever damaged the 6 and the 4 on the 1964 D also damaged the mintmark.

The 1956 D also shows wear and damage to the Mintmark.

Thanks,
Bill
Pillar of the Community
coppercoins's Avatar
United States
7629 Posts
 Posted 12/16/2008  8:45 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coppercoins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I wouldn't be so fast to snap judgement on the 1964D. That's one for closer examination. The photo is inconclusive.

The 1956D is die wear.
  Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 801Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.26 seconds to rattle this change. Forums