| Author |
 Replies: 13 / Views: 1,094 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
275 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19195 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
Korea, Republic Of
489 Posts |
 Looks like it. |
|
Valued Member
 United States
275 Posts |
Yes. I put it in the thread because of I wanted to know if I could get some feedback on the coin grading wise. Thanks!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
21627 Posts |
If you want it graded, you will have to post clear photos of both sides of the whole coin.
We cannot grade from blurry and partial photos. All the detail has to legible.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
275 Posts |
Thanks Jimmy D for the response. I actually took those picturies under my coin microscope and it was the best that I couuld do. Its not that the pictures are blurry it that the condition of the coin. I Barely caught those images because of the condition of the coin. I was just trying to get some feedback on at least from the pictures That were able to produce. The condition 0f the coin is the problem. the pictures are not blurred. Thats exactly how it looks on the coin even under the microscope. Thanks again for your input.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
First  Close up shots like these do not work well when grading. Ideally, posting a clear shot of the entire obverse and reverse will work. The first picture may have worked if it wasn't blurry (guessing this is the image JimmyD is referring to). I'd recommend taking a look at a few other posts in the grading section to get an idea of how the photos should look.  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
21627 Posts |
DMN
I was not referring to the partial closeups, they are not any good for grading coins.
As Ty2020B pointed out, I was referring to the first picture. In order to grade a coin and
as I pointed out on my other post, a full clear picture of both sides of the coin is required.
We have to be able to see the detail and any marks the coin may have.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19964 Posts |
Appears to be a vise job, worth 1 cent.
Lincoln Cent Lover!VERDI-CARE™ INVENTOR https://verdi.care/
|
|
Valued Member
United States
275 Posts |
Here are the full images of the coin Jimmy D. Thanks Everyone.   |
|
Valued Member
United States
90 Posts |
I do not think this is worth getting graded. It appears that the coin has been cleaned improperly, - my guess is VF-details. :)
|
|
Valued Member
United States
271 Posts |
Agree with not worth grading. Lots of wear. You might want to check for double D or other varieties/errors, too.
Stay well,
Diy89Nurm7
|
|
Valued Member
United States
275 Posts |
@ coin obsessed & Diy89Nurm7 Thanks for your feedback I really appreciate it.&  & Ive seen in the coin using the microscope that above liberty it looks like liberty was struck before or after the final strike and in other places on the coin especially on the obverse I can see other letters as if the lettering was struck on the coin before the final stike. I don't know if you can see what I mean in the partial shots I posted in the beginning. But I definitely see other letters and some type of doubling or first striking on the coin front and back. Edited by DMN
02/17/2021 8:45 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19195 Posts |
I agree with the feeling that the coin isn't worth submitting for grading. In addition to the obverse issues, the wheat stalks on the reverse show a fair amount of wear--given the photos posted.
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,094 |
|
Posted 02/09/2021 12:01 pm
