Thanks 1960NYGiants!
Regarding the "1820 Law", that cannot be the case for these issues (ie. the Wellington, Brocks, and Montreal token) as there are numerous articles in the Kingston Gazette referencing their abundant circulation as early as 1817!
Additionally, Faulkner notes that there does not appear to be any such 1820 law, at least nothing that has been found in legal records to date. This 1820 law has been referenced consistently in passing since the early 20th century. I believe it was invoked speculatively (by McLachlan?) to explain why the Bust and Harp tokens are antedated to this date from 1825. However, no other reference to the existence of this law has ever been brought forward since!
It really calls into question the timing of other series that are commonly believed to be antedated, such as the Sloops.
Regarding the "1820 Law", that cannot be the case for these issues (ie. the Wellington, Brocks, and Montreal token) as there are numerous articles in the Kingston Gazette referencing their abundant circulation as early as 1817!
Additionally, Faulkner notes that there does not appear to be any such 1820 law, at least nothing that has been found in legal records to date. This 1820 law has been referenced consistently in passing since the early 20th century. I believe it was invoked speculatively (by McLachlan?) to explain why the Bust and Harp tokens are antedated to this date from 1825. However, no other reference to the existence of this law has ever been brought forward since!
It really calls into question the timing of other series that are commonly believed to be antedated, such as the Sloops.






















