I would say that a 1985 D/S is not possible since the S mint dies starting that year had the mintmark as part of the master hub while the D mintmarks were still punched into the working dies by hand. The damage that he is calling an S mintmark on that coin is completely in the wrong place for a 1985 S cent die, and being in the hub it would be as strong and clear as the date numerals.
I took a look at several of his other "rare unlisted errors" and none of them are errors. Some MDD, some Die Deterioration, and a lot of wishful thinking.
I took a look at several of his other "rare unlisted errors" and none of them are errors. Some MDD, some Die Deterioration, and a lot of wishful thinking.
Edited by Conder101
12/31/2008 11:23 am
12/31/2008 11:23 am


















