| Author |
Replies: 16 / Views: 1,703 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1694 Posts |
For some reason 1904 P Morgans seem to be gaining price. I paid good money for the grade but she has nice eye appeal in my opinion and good looking 1904 p's are not super common. sellers pics  
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
561 Posts |
Morgans aren't my strongest. I think I would go MS64, but the relatively limited number of dings, though deep, I could see it being MS65
The isolated dings I am referencing are the gash in front of the ear, in the center of the neck, under we on reverse, and reeding hit on the lips. Also a few stray drags in the fields, most notable that above the eagle.
All in all, low impact on eye appeal, great looking coin overall!
Edited by PNWType 05/18/2021 11:36 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
599 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Can you show us a pic with more light on the obverse fields?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19167 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2955 Posts |
This one is similar to my 1904 post from earlier, though I know most 1904s have subdued luster, so to find one with appreciable luster is not that easy. I got lucky on mine  .
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1694 Posts |
Coinfrog that's the seller pics I can when I get it
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Got it, thanks. I just think there might be a lot of marks on those surfaces that the dark photo conceals. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18673 Posts |
typical weak strike for this year. luster broken on both sides. eye appeal AVG to AVG- due to all the scuffs and marks. AU58 or MS63. I'm leaning AU58
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6387 Posts |
Looks mint state to me, with adequate luster and no visible wear. Quite a few small contact marks but nothing too distracting. Strike weakness accounts for lack of detail above ear and on eagle's breast. MS-63 is the usual grade for an "average" MS Morgan and it seems to fit here.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18673 Posts |
I originally called AU58 or MS63 and went with AU further review of this coin and I'm going with MS63
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
MS-63 would not surprise.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1694 Posts |
ok here is a few other pics , coin came today , I will reveal the grade later tonight.  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4692 Posts |
Looks MS-62 to me, maybe better.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1694 Posts |
So grade is AU-58 tilting the coin to see any shadows there just really is no luster breaks or rub minus the bag marks. I personally think she ooks MS-62+ to maybe 63 maybe I am missing something but certainly super close to MS if she is not
|
|
Pillar of the Community
2224 Posts |
Your pics are better, 62-63 IMO.
|
| |
Replies: 16 / Views: 1,703 |