Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsVancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors 300,000 items to help build your collection! Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes.








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

95 D 1c And A 96 D 1c Off Set And Error Or Damaged

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 847Next Topic  
Valued Member

United States
68 Posts
 Posted 05/29/2021  07:53 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Derfsup to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I'm just trying to figure out what is what I guess. I'm new and So far what I see is alot differnt from what your responses and help have been on the things I've posted. I got these 2 coins ones a 1995 D penny and a 1996 D penny so they're both offset I'm pretty sure and they both have a similar mark which I think is a die clash. This is where I could use some help. Are they both the same problem or are they different? Are they errors worth keeping? Or what would they be ty
95-D-1c-And-A-96-D-1c--Off-Set-And-Error-Or-Damaged
95-D-1c-And-A-96-D-1c--Off-Set-And-Error-Or-Damaged
95-D-1c-And-A-96-D-1c--Off-Set-And-Error-Or-Damaged
95-D-1c-And-A-96-D-1c--Off-Set-And-Error-Or-Damaged
95-D-1c-And-A-96-D-1c--Off-Set-And-Error-Or-Damaged
95-D-1c-And-A-96-D-1c--Off-Set-And-Error-Or-Damaged
95-D-1c-And-A-96-D-1c--Off-Set-And-Error-Or-Damaged
95-D-1c-And-A-96-D-1c--Off-Set-And-Error-Or-Damaged
95-D-1c-And-A-96-D-1c--Off-Set-And-Error-Or-Damaged
95-D-1c-And-A-96-D-1c--Off-Set-And-Error-Or-Damaged
95-D-1c-And-A-96-D-1c--Off-Set-And-Error-Or-Damaged
Moderator
Learn More...
John1's Avatar
United States
56855 Posts
 Posted 05/29/2021  07:56 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add John1 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
What I am seeing is linear trail gas bubbles. The 95 does not look "off set" the other looks to be a very minor MAD. You need to filter your light source.Where are you seeing a die clash?
John1
Bedrock of the Community
Coinfrog's Avatar
United States
94367 Posts
 Posted 05/29/2021  09:31 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Coinfrog to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Agree, all I see are linear plating bubbles.



to the CCF!
Bedrock of the Community
coop's Avatar
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 05/29/2021  09:40 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
These could be pushed down with a toothpick. No premium for these. The reflection on the full shots are from too bright of a light. (Looks like three strong light sources) They are too spotlight like. It looks like they need to be diffused. Perhaps with computer paper. To reduce the glare. Depending on your sources of light. The micro images are perfect. Keep that setup. I always use, just a single bulb source. A single light source give light and shadows. With to many light sources, you have light and glare. Too much light removes color.
  Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 847Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.2 seconds to rattle this change. Forums