Just a few ideas in case anyone from the Mint is reading...
If they wanted to, the Mint could essentially serialize these by removing four reeds from the edge:
One in a predefined location on the coin as the reference point (i.e. index 0, or start counting from here).
One with the entire reed missing as the first two digits (i.e. 36 away from the reference point >> first two digits are 36).
One with the top (obverse) half of the reed missing as the middle two digits.
One with the bottom (reverse) half of the reed missing as the final two digits.
If there are at least 101 reeds (I've never counted, but that seems to be a reasonable guess), you could make almost a million combinations this way (with the exception that you can't use any numbers that would require missing reeds in the same place, such as 362536).
They could also delete a reference reed in a standard location--and then remove 10 or so other reeds in other locations and multiply them to get a serial number. This should give enough numbers to be able to use something analogous to a check digit (or some other similar validation tool).
If they wanted to, the Mint could essentially serialize these by removing four reeds from the edge:
One in a predefined location on the coin as the reference point (i.e. index 0, or start counting from here).
One with the entire reed missing as the first two digits (i.e. 36 away from the reference point >> first two digits are 36).
One with the top (obverse) half of the reed missing as the middle two digits.
One with the bottom (reverse) half of the reed missing as the final two digits.
If there are at least 101 reeds (I've never counted, but that seems to be a reasonable guess), you could make almost a million combinations this way (with the exception that you can't use any numbers that would require missing reeds in the same place, such as 362536).
They could also delete a reference reed in a standard location--and then remove 10 or so other reeds in other locations and multiply them to get a serial number. This should give enough numbers to be able to use something analogous to a check digit (or some other similar validation tool).
Edited by msl2196
08/12/2021 10:16 am
08/12/2021 10:16 am



















