| Author |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,398 |
|
|
New Member
United States
12 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
21616 Posts |
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news but that is a zinc coin. You can see zinc rot starting to set in which would not be on a copper coin. Weigh it anyways when you get your scales and let us know.
|
|
New Member
 United States
12 Posts |
Rats! I guess I need to read up on what zinc rot is. I just started learning about coins a few days ago. The scale will be here tomorrow. Maybe it's just a heavy zinc coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
509 Posts |
 with JimmyD. Your current scale is going to read 3 grams regardless if it is a copper or zinc Cent. Zinc's weigh 2.55 on average which would round the weight to 3 grams and Copper's weigh 3.11 on average which would round down to 3 grams. I too am seeing what appears to be zinc rot on your coin. Zooming in on the mint mark further looks like Die Deterioration Doubling which shows itself fairly well, and often, on common copper plated zinc Lincolns.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19176 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2854 Posts |
Just weigh another cent on your current scale to see if its calibrated correctly.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10635 Posts |
I agree, you can see the zinc rot starting, so sorry not the copper cent you were looking for. Yes, it is a small date, yes it's from the Denver mint, it's just the wrong material to be the rare copper cent everyone wants to find. Keep searching! 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
 to the CCF!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1566 Posts |
 To CCF. Can you put the 1982 D Small Date LMC on the scale and get us a closeup shot ? To me it looks like you are showing two different coins. If the coin on the scale IS a 1982 D small Date Copper Coin then you just found a nice chunk of cash for one rare penny. If not 
Edited by Daves Errors 10/25/2021 5:07 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
21616 Posts |
Daves Errors Read Bumkins post. His scale does not read to decimals so can be out .5 g either way
|
|
Moderator
 United States
96674 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
509 Posts |
Thank you JimmyD and thank you Dearborn.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1566 Posts |
Ok I guess I am confused on this one sorry. >> Bumpkin said Your current scale is going to read 3 grams regardless if it is a copper or zinc Cent. Please enlighten this simple old mind how it's taking two different weights and is showing the same weight of 3 grams. 2.5 is 2.5 and 3.1 is 3.1 I thought!
Edited by Daves Errors 10/26/2021 12:11 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
509 Posts |
Hey Dave. I was referring to the op's scale, in the provided pics, and that the scale only reads out in one full digit and that it does not have the capability to read out in tenths or hundredths. With this being the case, anything put on that scale will round up or down to a solid number. A zincoln will round up from 2.5 grams to a reading of 3 grams..... and a copper Linc will round down from 3.1 grams to a reading 3 grams on this scale. Hopefully this helped clarify things..
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1566 Posts |
So is what you are telling me is this scale  is a LIAR. It's telling people you are eating 3 grams of sugar but you are really eating 3.5 and getting fatter every time you use this scale right? 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
509 Posts |
Quote: It's telling people you are eating 3 grams of sugar but you are really eating 3.5 and getting fatter every time Not to get technical here (but I guess I am.... lol) If you were eating 3.5 grams of sugar the op's scale would show you 4 grams as it would round up from .5 ...... haha! The op said they are getting a scale that reads out further than whole number grams, hopefully in hundredths. We shall wait and see.......
Edited by Bumpkin 10/26/2021 12:29 am
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,398 |
|