| Author |
Replies: 12 / Views: 793 |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11980 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7339 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7734 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3848 Posts |
Good eye appeal, and no problems (as far as I can see with blurry photos). I get an XF-45 vibe off of this one.
Suffering from bust half fever. Want to learn how to attribute early half dollars by die variety? Click Here: http://goccf.com/t/434955Shoot me a PM if you are looking to sell bust halves.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5722 Posts |
An attractive XF-45. Is that just some staining around stars 1, 2, and 3?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18946 Posts |
I have the obverse at AU50, reverse at XF45. i'll go with XF45 overall
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I wouldn't be uncomfortable with an AU-50 call.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1173 Posts |
Nice coin, I'd also go with XF-45.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1873 Posts |
I'm with Coinfrog. I've seen worse AUs
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1789 Posts |
XF45, would not be surpised at AU50
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
838 Posts |
XF45-AU50, I agree with others
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2018 Posts |
I'm at XF as well and $119 is reasonable for that grade. The lack of luster is the only thing keeping me from saying AU. The slight rubs indicate AU but the luster doesn't. Shame because the value spikes another $100 in AU grade.
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 793 |
|