| Author |
 Replies: 14 / Views: 978 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2843 Posts |
I picked this up today. What do you all think of it?   |
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11896 Posts |
MS63+. Little too much obverse chatter in the obverse focal point of the cheek for 64. Nice clean obverse fields. Reverse is beautiful and looks gem. Great looking coin!  Edited by numismatic student
11/18/2021 4:39 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1694 Posts |
MS-63 to much on the cheek to make 64
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
First impression was MS63 and I agree with Jason, just a little too much cheek chatter for 64.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2869 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2955 Posts |
Yeah, to me it nets MS-63+ due to obverse marks.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2281 Posts |
MS62
You realize when you know how to think, it empowers you far beyond those who know only what to think.
-Neil deGrasse Tyson
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18680 Posts |
typical sharp strike for this year. nice amount of luster. I'm netting this one to MS62. a little much chatter and abrasions on the obverse to make 63 imo.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1775 Posts |
MS-62 - clean fields but too much chatter on the cheek
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1048 Posts |
It's gorgeous -- especially that delicious reverse -- but I think PCGS would return it as MS62+.
The grade isn't everything. Very desirable specimen, I'd say.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6579 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1023 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 978 |
|
Posted 11/18/2021 4:44 pm
