| Author |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,519 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2637 Posts |
This is a scan. The apparent rim damage in the photos is not on the coin. Based on Coins and Canada, this looks like an XF to me.  
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1618 Posts |
I'd say its closer to VF-30
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I'm thinking closer to EF-40.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
5394 Posts |
VF 30 is about bang on for our standards . Is that a scratch obverse?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
599 Posts |
Pic is not good enough to grade properly.
Watch your top knot
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
5585 Posts |
Based on the vertical jewels and crown band, VF-30, maybe 30+
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3328 Posts |
VF30+ sounds right to me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
851 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
9156 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3328 Posts |
From the Saskatoon coin grading description I say it would fall closer to EF40
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
668 Posts |
VF35 IMO but I must agree the Saskatoon reference would have it at EF40 atleast..
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1081 Posts |
Saskatoon is a great resource: basically a set of nearly complete PCGS visuals for Canadian coins. I use it all the time. Also Andre Langlois who is closer to the Canadian norm for grading. If you have those two then you're in good shape.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2637 Posts |
Many thanks for all the replies.
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,519 |
|